dug777 Lifer Oct 13, 2004 24,778 4 0 Jul 27, 2008 #1 Waste of time? Worth trying to tighten the timings at 800 instead? How do I go about doing that?
M Mr Fox Senior member Sep 24, 2006 876 0 76 Jul 27, 2008 #2 Originally posted by: dug777 Waste of time? Worth trying to tighten the timings at 800 instead? How do I go about doing that? Click to expand... Timings mean little.. you are just better off to get stable... speed means little.. Timings were an AMD kinda thing...
Originally posted by: dug777 Waste of time? Worth trying to tighten the timings at 800 instead? How do I go about doing that? Click to expand... Timings mean little.. you are just better off to get stable... speed means little.. Timings were an AMD kinda thing...
taltamir Lifer Mar 21, 2004 13,576 6 76 Jul 27, 2008 #3 benchmark some of your programs. but generally the benefit is negligible. ram needs to be stable, fast enough, and plentiful.
benchmark some of your programs. but generally the benefit is negligible. ram needs to be stable, fast enough, and plentiful.
dug777 Lifer Oct 13, 2004 24,778 4 0 Jul 28, 2008 #4 Shows you how out of it I am Different tack: any advantages to cranking my FSB? So dropping the multiplier to keep around stock speed? EDIT: Will ask this in CPU instead. Thanks folks
Shows you how out of it I am Different tack: any advantages to cranking my FSB? So dropping the multiplier to keep around stock speed? EDIT: Will ask this in CPU instead. Thanks folks
DSF Diamond Member Oct 6, 2007 4,902 0 71 Jul 28, 2008 #5 The advantage is minimal. You may show a slight gain (2-3%) in some applications, but not terribly much. It won't hurt anything.
The advantage is minimal. You may show a slight gain (2-3%) in some applications, but not terribly much. It won't hurt anything.