Originally posted by: munky
256mb will not be of much use in a 6600gt, because you'd need a more powerful card like the 6800gt or the x800xt that can smoothly run games at settings that require 256mb. A 6600gt is not enough to run the latest games at max settings, so 128mb should be enough.
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: munky
256mb will not be of much use in a 6600gt, because you'd need a more powerful card like the 6800gt or the x800xt that can smoothly run games at settings that require 256mb. A 6600gt is not enough to run the latest games at max settings, so 128mb should be enough.
nonsense, the extra 128MB does make a significant difference . . . even more so than the 9800xt vs 9800p - in today's games . . . not the old ones. . . . the benchs i remember put it much closer to the 6800NU than the std 6600GT.
unfortunately [i believe the 256-6600GT was priced rather high compared to the 128MB ver . . . in that case, you might do better to get a 6800GS if you can afford to spend just over $200]
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: munky
256mb will not be of much use in a 6600gt, because you'd need a more powerful card like the 6800gt or the x800xt that can smoothly run games at settings that require 256mb. A 6600gt is not enough to run the latest games at max settings, so 128mb should be enough.
nonsense, the extra 128MB does make a significant difference . . . even more so than the 9800xt vs 9800p - in today's games . . . not the old ones. . . . the benchs i remember put it much closer to the 6800NU than the std 6600GT.
unfortunately [i believe the 256-6600GT was priced rather high compared to the 128MB ver . . . in that case, you might do better to get a 6800GS if you can afford to spend just over $200]
link?