Originally posted by: bupkus
When I was concerned with my main box, which is an epox with nForce 2 chipset and an AGP video card, I was trying to use the dual memory controller to maximize performance. I've had the impression lately that dual controller performance was not so significant as once touted.
However, here I'm discussing an IGP so perhaps the rules and issues have changed. :shocked:
There are a few bandwidths to concern yourself with:
The bandwidth between a P4 CPU and the chipset is twice the bandwidth of a single DIMM channel running the same frequency. So, dual-channel DDR P4 motherboards realize performance benefits, as the CPU is not memory bandwidth-starved anymore.
The bandwidth between an Athlon XP CPU and the chipset = the bandwidth of a single DIMM channel running at the same frequency. So only some caching done by the CPU can utilize the additional memory bandwidth, and there isn't a huge benefit to it.
But when you're running IGP, there are TWO simultaneous demands on the memory- the CPU operations and the graphics operations. So, dual-channel memory architecture has the bandwidth to keep both the CPU and the graphics core happy.
Think about it this way:
The P4 is the equivalent of two cars on the road. Having a two-lane highway is a benefit, and the integrated graphics is the third car, which will cause a traffic jam.
The Athlon XP is a single car - So it doesn't get much benefit from a two-lane highway.
Athlon XP plus integrated graphics is two cars. On a single lane highway, you get traffic jams. On a two lane highway, it's smoother.