Originally posted by: z42
I'm an A's fan, and I still think that it's hard to say how good he is.
He may be the best at drafting or running a minor league system. But if you look at some of the "big name" guys he has signed lately, a lot of them have been busts. Dye was hurt, but you still have guys like Dotel, Rhodes, Loaiza etc who have been given big contracts for very little success.
So basically what I'm saying is that it's hard to compare when the factors are so different. Maybe the Marlins GM is better than him, but with a $14mill payroll how could we know? I would have to throw the GM of the Twins into the mix if you look at what they have put together with a limited payroll as well.
Originally posted by: Abel007
They did more with less, but not year after year. Many, many clubs had more resources(cash) than the Braves over the last 16 years and not a single one achieved what the Braves did during that stretch.
In 1991 they had the 3rd best record in baseball.Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: Abel007
They did more with less, but not year after year. Many, many clubs had more resources(cash) than the Braves over the last 16 years and not a single one achieved what the Braves did during that stretch.
you dont think being in the nl east has something to do with it?
Didn't the NY Yankees have 114 wins in 1998? If so I don't see how the braves topped 114 wins in that season.Originally posted by: Abel007
In 1991 they had the 3rd best record in baseball.Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: Abel007
They did more with less, but not year after year. Many, many clubs had more resources(cash) than the Braves over the last 16 years and not a single one achieved what the Braves did during that stretch.
you dont think being in the nl east has something to do with it?
In 1992 they had the best record in baseball.
In 1993 they had the best record in baseball.
In 1994, strike season.
In 1995 they had the 2nd best record in baseball.
In 1996 they had the 2nd best record in baseball.
In 1997 they had the best record in baseball.
In 1998 they had the best record in baseball.
In 1999 they had the best record in baseball.
In 2000 they had the 2nd best record in baseball.
In 2001 they had the got got lucky with only 88 wins.
In 2002 they had the 3rd best record in baseball.
In 2003 they had the best record in baseball.
In 2004 they had the 4th best in baseball.
In 2005 they only had 90 wins. Another luck year.
No, I don't think being in the NL East had anything to do with it. Why can't you just give props to a great baseball team of the 90s? Led by John Schuerholz and Bobby Cox, the Braves were a very dominating team.
EDIT* and bah you edited your post to add more.![]()
Originally posted by: HopJokey
Didn't the NY Yankees have 114 wins in 1998? If so I don't see how the braves topped 114 wins in that season.Originally posted by: Abel007
In 1991 they had the 3rd best record in baseball.Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: Abel007
They did more with less, but not year after year. Many, many clubs had more resources(cash) than the Braves over the last 16 years and not a single one achieved what the Braves did during that stretch.
you dont think being in the nl east has something to do with it?
In 1992 they had the best record in baseball.
In 1993 they had the best record in baseball.
In 1994, strike season.
In 1995 they had the 2nd best record in baseball.
In 1996 they had the 2nd best record in baseball.
In 1997 they had the best record in baseball.
In 1998 they had the best record in baseball.
In 1999 they had the best record in baseball.
In 2000 they had the 2nd best record in baseball.
In 2001 they had the got got lucky with only 88 wins.
In 2002 they had the 3rd best record in baseball.
In 2003 they had the best record in baseball.
In 2004 they had the 4th best in baseball.
In 2005 they only had 90 wins. Another luck year.
No, I don't think being in the NL East had anything to do with it. Why can't you just give props to a great baseball team of the 90s? Led by John Schuerholz and Bobby Cox, the Braves were a very dominating team.
EDIT* and bah you edited your post to add more.![]()
Originally posted by: Abel007
As many as the Red Sox.![]()
Originally posted by: Abel007
True, but how many times were they in the postseason? Somehow I don't think your answer will be anywhere near 15 over the last 16 years.
And yes, I know the Marlins haven't been around for all of the last 16 years.![]()
Originally posted by: Don Rodriguez
Yes, his name is Omar Minaya.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Don Rodriguez
Yes, his name is Omar Minaya.
not really. what has the guy done but passed out checks?
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: Abel007
True, but how many times were they in the postseason? Somehow I don't think your answer will be anywhere near 15 over the last 16 years.
And yes, I know the Marlins haven't been around for all of the last 16 years.![]()
What's the goal here? Is it to win a lameass division and bow out in the first round or is it to win the whole shebang? EVERY baseball player on earth would trade a bunch of playoff defeats for one more world series title. Nobody is playing for 4th place.
What the Braves accomplished was impressive, but they will forever be remembered not for that streak, but for their failure to win the World Series.
Originally posted by: oddyager
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Don Rodriguez
Yes, his name is Omar Minaya.
not really. what has the guy done but passed out checks?
He'll probably be better remembered (we'll know in a few years) for things he hasn't done, like trading away their best prospects for has-beens.
