• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

IS their better driver for multi monitor with nvidia geforce2mx? Which is the best multi monitor card with good gaming t

M

mmx

Diamond Member
I like geforce 2mx(leadtek with 2 monitor output + tv out, 5ns mem etc..)i have it under win2k. But their multi monitor sucks. I had a g450 before and I loved it, but gaming suck.

Can't we combine both card? no really is the next version of matrox card good for gaming, I heard no, but i pray to g-d yes.
 
I would have to agree. Matrox cards have always been all about business applications and awesome 2D performance, as well as excellent MMS support. i was the guy selling the quad-head G100s in the FS/FT forum, and although those cards were a bit old, they were GREAT.

I've tried a few of the dual monitor video cards, an Asus Gf2MX twinview, a Radeon VE, and the G450, and all I have to say is FUGGETABOUTIT.

It's all about getting a monster fast primary video card, and a good 2d pci video card like an S3 for your secondary. It's not like those are expensive anyway. And besides, I don't know of any games that are multi-monitor, so it's not like you're going to need 3d acceleration on that second monitor anyway..

but then again, for those of you who have pci slots as prime real estate, it's a different story...
 
the g400 max with dual head is faster than the g450.

my primary card is an aiw radeon, and my secondary is a 4 MB matrox mystique (pre 220)... i need to replace mine with an 8MB board. but i am in no hurry
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top