Originally posted by: coomarlin
Originally posted by: torpid
UFC Pay per view events are turning into pretty weak events too.
I'm not quite sure I'd agree with that. Sure every once in a while you have a card that doesn't deliver. But generally speaking they provide better value. At least in my eyes they do.
Especially with Zuffa new aquisition of Pride. Look for some great events in the near future. Also look at the UFC73 card that is coming up. Probably the most stacked card the UFC has ever put together.
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: coomarlin
Originally posted by: torpid
UFC Pay per view events are turning into pretty weak events too.
I'm not quite sure I'd agree with that. Sure every once in a while you have a card that doesn't deliver. But generally speaking they provide better value. At least in my eyes they do.
Especially with Zuffa new aquisition of Pride. Look for some great events in the near future. Also look at the UFC73 card that is coming up. Probably the most stacked card the UFC has ever put together.
The issue is, there are virtually no non-ppv events, unlike boxing. And though they are still a better value than most ppv boxing events, they are getting more diluted over time. If I had to choose to buy every ppv of one sport, it would be MMA I guess, but with boxing I get everything I want to see from hbo and showtime. Even the de la hoya / mayweather fight will be on HBO this saturday.
Originally posted by: coomarlin
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: coomarlin
Originally posted by: torpid
UFC Pay per view events are turning into pretty weak events too.
I'm not quite sure I'd agree with that. Sure every once in a while you have a card that doesn't deliver. But generally speaking they provide better value. At least in my eyes they do.
Especially with Zuffa new aquisition of Pride. Look for some great events in the near future. Also look at the UFC73 card that is coming up. Probably the most stacked card the UFC has ever put together.
The issue is, there are virtually no non-ppv events, unlike boxing. And though they are still a better value than most ppv boxing events, they are getting more diluted over time. If I had to choose to buy every ppv of one sport, it would be MMA I guess, but with boxing I get everything I want to see from hbo and showtime. Even the de la hoya / mayweather fight will be on HBO this saturday.
There is a lot more MMA that is NON-PPV than there is PPV. Spike shows a lot of UFC based MMA with unleashed and the ultimate fighter. HBO will also be showing 4 live UFC events this year. Showtime is showing EliteXC fighting championships. Versus network will be the new home of World Extreme Cage Fighting (WEC). FSN has a Pride show and also televises the IFL events. MyNetwork has a new 2 hour show called IFL battleground, etc. MOJO occationally shows King of the Cage matches. The only PPV events in MMA is the biggest UFC matches and the biggest Pride fights. And the last UFC major event held in England was free on SpikeTV and UFC 72 in Ireland will also be free on Spike. ESPN is reportedly working on a deal to broadcase UFC as well.
I think you'd be hard pressed to find half the amount of boxing matches on free TV. Especially if you don't count ESPN classics.
Originally posted by: torpid:It's nice and all but you can't really follow current UFC events without buying their PPV or getting it illegally online.
Originally posted by: coomarlin
But your arguments about only getting UFC events on PPV or illegal downloads just don't hold up.
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: coomarlin
But your arguments about only getting UFC events on PPV or illegal downloads just don't hold up.
My argument was about important events, in other words, title fights. Ultimate Fight Night has never been a title fight to my knowledge. Spike's UF coverage consists of B-level fighters or old footage of A-level fighters, with the exception of the UFC in england event, which though called UFC had no title fights.
Inside the UFC is hardly the same thing. Having some dude summarize what's going on in the UFC with limited footage is hardly the same thing as watching a fight. It's basically like watching inside the NBA aftewards versus watching the actual game.
As I said, I like MMA about equally but boxing has some advantages, the main one being that you don't have to shell out $40+ to watch title fights. Your initial post was basically an MMA love fest where you claim to have lost interest in boxing but do not specify why except a possible reference to grossly exaggerated corruption issues and "value per hour" which UFC is slowly diluting with too many PPV events.
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: coomarlin
But your arguments about only getting UFC events on PPV or illegal downloads just don't hold up.
My argument was about important events, in other words, title fights. Ultimate Fight Night has never been a title fight to my knowledge. Spike's UF coverage consists of B-level fighters or old footage of A-level fighters, with the exception of the UFC in england event, which though called UFC had no title fights.
Inside the UFC is hardly the same thing. Having some dude summarize what's going on in the UFC with limited footage is hardly the same thing as watching a fight. It's basically like watching inside the NBA aftewards versus watching the actual game.
As I said, I like MMA about equally but boxing has some advantages, the main one being that you don't have to shell out $40+ to watch title fights. Your initial post was basically an MMA love fest where you claim to have lost interest in boxing but do not specify why except a possible reference to grossly exaggerated corruption issues and "value per hour" which UFC is slowly diluting with too many PPV events.
Originally posted by: Phokus
i've wondered, if mma has a larger audience. more ticket sales, etc., how come the fighters get paid far less than boxers?
Topic Title: Is the sport of boxing dead? Topic Summary: Is MMA the new king of fight sports?
Originally posted by: alkemyst
UFC will eventually get to where boxing is now.
Originally posted by: Lounatik
I think the pulse that everyone is trying to put their finger on is this: The MMA crowd wants to see fighter A go at it with fighter B. We do not care about belts, championships or organizations. Would you pay to watch Matt Hughes fight Georges St. Pierre even though neither is champ? I bet that there would be a boatload of PPV's just to see that fight. No title, just two great fighters going at it. Mirko vs. Randy Couture, Ninja vs. Anderson Silva , Big Nog vs Tim Sylvia or any other HW. These fights become compelling not because of title ramifications, but of the desire to see these fantastic fighters just throw down. In boxing, if it aint a title fight, it aint on any kind of tv anymore.