Is the detection of Methane on Mars another sign of life?

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
Methane poses Mars life puzzle
By Dr David Whitehouse
BBC News Online science editor

Methane has been found in the Martian atmosphere which scientists say could be a sign of present-day life on Mars.

It was detected by telescopes on Earth and has recently been confirmed by instruments onboard the European Space Agency's orbiting Mars Express craft.
Methane lives for a short time in the Martian atmosphere so it must be being constantly replenished.

There are two possible ways to do this. Either active volcanoes, but none have yet been found on Mars, or microbes.

Spectral signature

Astronomers have reported seeing the spectral signature of methane in the Martian atmosphere using several of the world's largest telescopes.

The Infrared telescope on Hawaii and the Gemini South observatory in Chile detected the gas last year, it has been revealed.


Scientists see two possibilities, both of them scientifically important, one of them sensational

Also scientists operating the Mars Express Planetary Fourier Spectrometer (FPS) have announced that they have found the spectral signature of methane in the Martian atmosphere.

In addition, the world's largest telescope, the twin Keck telescopes on Hawaii, have looked but have yet to report its findings.

Further evidence of methane on Mars will also be presented at a meeting next month by a consortium of astronomers using the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope.

Volcanic explanation

Methane is not a stable molecule in the Martian atmosphere. If it was not replenished it would only last a few hundred years before it vanished.

This means that the methane detected must be being replenished in some way.

Scientists see two possibilities, both of them scientifically important, one of them sensational.


It is possible that the methane is being produced by volcanic activity. Lava being deposited onto the surface, or released underground, could produce the gas.
That explanation has some difficulties, however. So far no active volcanic hotspots have been detected by the many spacecraft currently orbiting Mars.

If active volcanism is responsible then it is a major discovery with important implications. The sub-surface heat released by the volcano would melt the vast quantities of sub-surface ice discovered on Mars producing an environment suitable for life.

Life on Mars?

On Earth bacteria produce methane from hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Terrestrial microbes that produce methane do not need oxygen to thrive, and these are thought to be the type of microbes that could possibly live on Mars.

The twin rovers that landed on Mars in January will be unable to answer the question of the methane's origin as they are designed for geological work.

Future missions could include sensors to analyse the methane that may be able to determine if it is of biological origin.

The failed Beagle 2 mission had a device that could have sniffed the Martian atmosphere for methane.


Text
 

dmurray14

Golden Member
Feb 21, 2003
1,780
0
0
Interesting indeed.

heh, I love how they threw "The failed Beagle 2 mission had a device that could have sniffed the Martian atmosphere for methane" in there...real nice ;)
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Of course you realize that if Mars does have microbes, we won't (or shouldnt) be going there.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Of course you realize that if Mars does have microbes, we won't (or shouldnt) be going there.
:Q

Wow, now there is something I haven't thought about.....

But don't you think we would try and bring them back for study? At least try to determine if they would be dangerous?

Possibly let them reproduce in a lab? Analyze their DNA, decode their genome?

Who knows what kind of substances(drugs) they could produce, or.. the possibilities are endless.

Of course, they could be killer microbes and we'll all die a horrible death. But I think the benefits far outweigh the potential consequences.

We're advanced enough that we can control some microbes... aren't we?
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Of course you realize that if Mars does have microbes, we won't (or shouldnt) be going there.

Why not?

This isn't Star Trek, we don't have a Prime Directive. :p We have Manifest Destiny! :D
 

AndyHui

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member<br>AT FAQ M
Oct 9, 1999
13,141
17
81
In related news, scientists have discovered Mars smells like Uranus.
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
If volcanoes can generate methane, what about a meteor impact? Mars is full of craters and debris. I'm sure it's been hit quite a bit in the last few hundred years, it doesn't quite have the atmosphere we have to burn up a meteor.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Some Romulan or Klingon farted while having a picnic there...

I vote for microbiotic organisms, does not proof life existed there, could have came from a space rock or meteor
 

Grey

Platinum Member
Oct 14, 1999
2,737
2
81
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Of course you realize that if Mars does have microbes, we won't (or shouldnt) be going there.
:Q

Wow, now there is something I haven't thought about.....

But don't you think we would try and bring them back for study? At least try to determine if they would be dangerous?

Possibly let them reproduce in a lab? Analyze their DNA, decode their genome?

Who knows what kind of substances(drugs) they could produce, or.. the possibilities are endless.

Of course, they could be killer microbes and we'll all die a horrible death. But I think the benefits far outweigh the potential consequences.

We're advanced enough that we can control some microbes... aren't we?

Let's bring them back and release them on the planet and see if it turns anyone into zombies or anything. If not, then Mars is safe.