Is the Atom in the Eee faster than the celly it replaces?

BlueAcolyte

Platinum Member
Nov 19, 2007
2,793
2
0
Not really... Tom's Hardware did an article on it and it was about the same or weaker.
 

Soulkeeper

Diamond Member
Nov 23, 2001
6,731
155
106
well it does have HT support and all the latest instruction sets like sse3
when running recent optimized/threaded software it should have no problem beating the celeron options

 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: Soulkeeper
well it does have HT support and all the latest instruction sets like sse3
when running recent optimized/threaded software it should have no problem beating the celeron options

All Celerons are now C2D-based, and have SSE3, along with being out-of-order (much more efficient), compared to the in-order Atom. That even includes the mini-ITX Celerons, like this one. A 1.6 Ghz Atom takes 1:48 to run SuperPi 1M, while my 1.2 Ghz Celeron 220 (the same mini-ITX board I linked above) does it in 1:00.75.

edit: No flamewars, gotcha.:)
 

ELopes580

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
3,891
15
81
Originally posted by: myocardia
Originally posted by: Soulkeeper
well it does have HT support and all the latest instruction sets like sse3
when running recent optimized/threaded software it should have no problem beating the celeron options

All Celerons are now C2D-based, and have SSE3, along with being out-of-order (much more efficient), compared to the in-order Atom. That even includes the mini-ITX Celerons, like this one. A 1.6 Ghz Atom takes 1:48 to run SuperPi 1M, while my 1.2 Ghz Celeron 220 (the same mini-ITX board I linked above) does it in 1:00.75.

edit: No flamewars, gotcha.:)

Um, you do realize that the Celeron in the EeePC is not C2D derived, right?
 

Griswold

Senior member
Dec 24, 2004
630
0
0
Ah well, both options suck. They should offer an eee with a via nano when it becomes available... but that probably wont happen thanks to intels deep pockets. :p
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
Originally posted by: Griswold
Ah well, both options suck. They should offer an eee with a via nano when it becomes available... but that probably wont happen thanks to intels deep pockets. :p

Unfortunately the Asus the competition is arguably better. I'd rather have one of the competitor products with a VIA Nano than an Eee PC with one.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: ELopes580
Um, you do realize that the Celeron in the EeePC is not C2D derived, right?

Actually, I didn't. I never would have thought they'd be using Banias cores in them. Intel must have given Asus a rally good deal on 'em, because it's been years since they made those Banias cores. This thread is an interesting read for those interested in the Atom-based Eee.