- Aug 20, 2000
- 20,577
- 432
- 126
I've been thinking about something I read from a book of Michael Moore's a few months ago - it's stuck with me as being particularly flagrant in its dismissal of "the American dream".
To recap, the American dream: "The faith held by many in the United States of America that through hard work and determination one can achieve a better life for oneself, usually through the earning of money."
For the sake of argument, let's place the minimal standard of the American Dream to be a multi-millionaire in the range of $2 million to $10 million dollars of mostly liquid assets. Next, let's consider this excerpt of a post (the poster's name is irrelevant):
In Moore's opinion, this is proper because it A) removes false hopes and B) has us vote for policies that can help us in the way we stand today instead of voting for policies that will help us when we make that impossible step up.
This all strikes me as horribly illogical. Sure, changing economic classes isn't easy, but it's still accomplished with regularity. If it was easy, everyone would be rich. Not to mention the mountains of anecdotal evidence against the idea - including the author of the book himself!
It also strikes me as promoting class hatreds and the tyranny of the majority in the worst way: We'll never be rich, so damn those bastards to hell while we vote for things that benefit us.
Lastly, I find it morally offensive. Who is Mr. Moore to know that you or I will never strike it big? Who is he to tell us to give up on aspiring to the top? Of all the things we all too easily tar and feather as 'anti-American', I think this is one of the few thoughts that truly is. This ideal sets America apart - don't tarnish it, or risk losing the special place in history that the U.S. still inhibits.
To recap, the American dream: "The faith held by many in the United States of America that through hard work and determination one can achieve a better life for oneself, usually through the earning of money."
For the sake of argument, let's place the minimal standard of the American Dream to be a multi-millionaire in the range of $2 million to $10 million dollars of mostly liquid assets. Next, let's consider this excerpt of a post (the poster's name is irrelevant):
I've always found that both amusing and perplexing. In his book, Michael Moore stated that (to paraphrase) we, the middle class of the West, have been fooled to believe that we can do better than which we are doing today. Also, the middle classes of other countries have long since realized that such improvement is impossible and have instead decided to be happy with their lot in life.Originally posted by: _____
And that's because of the way that the __________ message is formulated and financed- America's 18 wealthiest families, for example, have spearheaded the campaign to eliminate inheritance tax. And that's because it's of great benefit to them, and of no benefit whatsoever to 98% of Americans. That 98% merely dreams it will help them, which is what they've been taught to dream, to believe...
In Moore's opinion, this is proper because it A) removes false hopes and B) has us vote for policies that can help us in the way we stand today instead of voting for policies that will help us when we make that impossible step up.
This all strikes me as horribly illogical. Sure, changing economic classes isn't easy, but it's still accomplished with regularity. If it was easy, everyone would be rich. Not to mention the mountains of anecdotal evidence against the idea - including the author of the book himself!
It also strikes me as promoting class hatreds and the tyranny of the majority in the worst way: We'll never be rich, so damn those bastards to hell while we vote for things that benefit us.
Lastly, I find it morally offensive. Who is Mr. Moore to know that you or I will never strike it big? Who is he to tell us to give up on aspiring to the top? Of all the things we all too easily tar and feather as 'anti-American', I think this is one of the few thoughts that truly is. This ideal sets America apart - don't tarnish it, or risk losing the special place in history that the U.S. still inhibits.