You do understand that most of the TARP money ended up being paid back.This is not true at all. Take a look at the data from CBO: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9959/1-2009-MBR.pdf
In FY2008, by Dec 2007, federal intake was $606B and outlay was $713B, about $100B deficit
In FY2007, by Dec 2008, federal intake was $548B (less revenue due to lower personal and corporate income taxes during the recession) and outlays were $1,032B, vast majority of the increase driven by TARP funding.
Deficit was about $500B by Dec 2008. In THREE months into the federal fiscal year, when BUSH was in the office, after BUSH and the Republicans led the country into the recession.
![]()
Tax cuts don't need to be "paid" for. They aren't spending. Period.
Please elaborate on this new economic school you have discovered...I thought she was a big fan of kenzion economics seeing how it pulled us out of the recession.
Great argument...
We shouldn't vote Republican because they only claim to spend less money.
Instead we should vote Democrat because at least they are honest about spending tons of money.
Did I get that right?
![]()
Tax cuts don't need to be "paid" for. They aren't spending. Period.
I can't tell if this is tongue-in-cheek or true. If it is true, this succintly explains the fiscal mess the Republicans gift-wrapped for the country and are now blaming Obama and the Democrats for.
I never said Republicans are blameless. They're just as at fault as Democrats for not reigning in spending.
But the plain fact of the matter is that, any way you slice it, tax cuts are NOT GOVERNMENT SPENDING. Period. Full stop. End. Exclaimation point. Mark. Done. Fin.
So what happens to budget deficits? I know a lot of Tea Partiers are very upset about the budget deficits. What should we do about deficits that are caused by dramatic tax cuts?
Er..uh... Stop spending money you don't have?
So you first cut the taxes so you don't have as much money
Then you look for places to cut
OK, got it. So, what do you cut then?
And how do you know what you are cutting is better than having the money?
Talking points for this have yet to be released.
Everything.
I'm a big believer that the federal government is fully 2x the size it needs to be. Slice it in half. Half everything from congressional stipends to senate salaries to the presidential travel budget. Cut it ALL in half. Make the government work more efficiently.
Letting people keep more of their money is never a bad thing. What's bad is a government that cannot live within its means (and both major parties are guilty of this.)
I don't know much about her record as governor and mayor. Does anyone here know if she was a fiscal conservative?
