Opteron 150 is cheaper than an AthlonFX-51, let alone an FX-53 or any of the Socket 939 CPUs. In fact, you can build a DUAL Opteron 246 system cheaper than any Athlon FX or Socket 939 system, with each of the CPUs being only 400MHz less than the Athlon FX.
It doesn't seem right that the "enthusiast" CPUs are higher priced than the "server" CPUs, with little if any speed advantage.
Not only that, but it seems to me that the Socket 940 architecture is more future-proof as we already know you can add a 2nd CPU later with that, or upgrade to dual-core for a 4-way system on Socket 940, but this is not so certain on 939. This is also strange to me, as businesses generally buy whole new systems rather than upgrading. Home users are far more likely to do CPU upgrades.
Thoughts?
I was going to buy a Socket 939 system in a month or 2 after the initial prices drop, but right now they are so far out there with so little upside I think I will go with a "server" board instead.
It doesn't seem right that the "enthusiast" CPUs are higher priced than the "server" CPUs, with little if any speed advantage.
Not only that, but it seems to me that the Socket 940 architecture is more future-proof as we already know you can add a 2nd CPU later with that, or upgrade to dual-core for a 4-way system on Socket 940, but this is not so certain on 939. This is also strange to me, as businesses generally buy whole new systems rather than upgrading. Home users are far more likely to do CPU upgrades.
Thoughts?
I was going to buy a Socket 939 system in a month or 2 after the initial prices drop, but right now they are so far out there with so little upside I think I will go with a "server" board instead.