Is Open Office getting bloated???

redgtxdi

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2004
5,464
8
81
Just wondering if it's getting a little too large?

I disabled that auto startup feature it now has........(I hate when stuff starts up on its own)......and maybe that's what causes a little longer to open, but noticed that when I open any of the OO's programs, they take longer than office XP.

Think I'm gonna uninstall & go back to Office XP for now, but am gonna really be disappointed if OO's turning into bloatware!!!

:(
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,936
11,267
126
After the first opening of each program after install, I find that it opens much quicker on subsequent attempts. It feels a little fat, but I like it for my limited office needs.
 

nova2

Senior member
Feb 3, 2006
982
1
0
without the speed loader it opens in around 2-3 seconds for me.

with speed loader it is near instant.
 
Oct 27, 2007
17,009
5
0
It's much slower to open that the older versions. I've given up on OOo, I just use Google Docs for my limited word processing needs these days.
 

tcsenter

Lifer
Sep 7, 2001
18,954
577
126
Just wondering if it's getting a little too large?
You mean full featured applications actually are larger and more unwieldy than cut-down-to-basics alternatives, no matter the business model? Say it isn't so! :p

I have noticed longer launch times going from Open Office 1.1.4 -> 2.0.x -> 2.2.x -> 2.4.2, even with the quick launch feature. Haven't tried 3.x yet.


Originally posted by: lxskllr
After the first opening of each program after install, I find that it opens much quicker on subsequent attempts.
Umm...that's how all applications work, unless they can somehow opt-out of caching and paging or numerous other applications are subsequently used after initial launch.
 

VinylxScratches

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2009
1,666
0
0
IBM Lotus Symphony is a nice alternative. It seems to work a bit faster. I'm not sure how well it is compatibility wise with Word documents though.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
71,319
14,087
126
www.anyf.ca
I never understood why any office app needs to be so big. It's not like it's doing anything all that complicated. It's basically a glorified html editor that saves in a special format (so images and stuff are embeded). I find this is happening to all software, programmers are just saying "screw it" when it comes to writing efficient code, figuring "today's computers are fast anyway".
 

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,964
158
106
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
I never understood why any office app needs to be so big. It's not like it's doing anything all that complicated. It's basically a glorified html editor that saves in a special format (so images and stuff are embeded). I find this is happening to all software, programmers are just saying "screw it" when it comes to writing efficient code, figuring "today's computers are fast anyway".

:thumbsup:
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,936
11,267
126
Originally posted by: tcsenter


Originally posted by: lxskllr
After the first opening of each program after install, I find that it opens much quicker on subsequent attempts.
Umm...that's how all applications work, unless they can somehow opt-out of caching and paging or numerous other applications are subsequently used after initial launch.

That's not what I meant :^/ I'm talking about the very first time you use it after installing the program. It probably takes 5 times as long to load as any subsequent attempt, even after rebooting the machine.