What if you think Garfield and Cleveland were great Presidents?
The presidency has never been graced with another the likes of James K Polk. I base all my calculations on him.
What if you think Garfield and Cleveland were great Presidents?
What you're missing is a simple question. Are you better off now than when he took office? Answer it honestly.
I'm sure you'd be a billionaire by now if it wasn't for Obama.I personally am, but that is despite Obama, not because of his continued damage to the economy.
I think he is a decent President.
But that is ALL he is.
As I mentioned in another thread, he is President, not King.
What has he done that makes him a decent president
Yes, because it is him that killed terrorists, and not a continuation of policies that have been in place for nearly a decade.Killed a bunch of terrorists.
That's been pretty decent.
Yes, because it is him that killed terrorists, and not a continuation of policies that have been in place for nearly a decade.
Yes, because it is him that killed terrorists, and not a continuation of policies that have been in place for nearly a decade.
Mostly it's a continuation of existing policies, but since he could have changed them, he still deserves credit. And he made a hard, politically risky call resulting in taking out Usama bin Ladin. (I think all the Pubbie candidates except Paul would have made the same call, but Obama DID make the call and deserves the credit. The one who takes the risks gets the credit.)Yes, because it is him that killed terrorists, and not a continuation of policies that have been in place for nearly a decade.
Many of those were blocked by Republicans.
Killed a bunch of terrorists.
That's been pretty decent.
He also killed many INNOCENT people, but I guess they dont matter right
He also killed many INNOCENT people, but I guess they dont matter right
He is a good President with a TERRIBLE Congress.