Is Media Center more like XP/Pro or XP/Home

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
Is Media Center more akin to the Pro or Home version. Also, does Home work properly with dual core processors? I was under the impression that only Pro worked with multiple processors.

 

MrChad

Lifer
Aug 22, 2001
13,507
3
81
I'm not sure about MCE, but you are right that only XP Pro supports multiple physical processors. All variations of XP (including Home) support multi-core processors.
 

Markbnj

Elite Member <br>Moderator Emeritus
Moderator
Sep 16, 2005
15,682
14
81
www.markbetz.net
I don't believe this is true. First, Windows doesn't know whether you have multiple processors or multiple cores: multiple cores look just like multiple processors to the system. Second, Microsoft states in a number of places that XP Pro supports multiple processors while XP Home does not. I haven't been able to find specific information about MCE, but I am guessing it does not, as it is built on XP Home.
 

wexsmith

Member
Oct 7, 2004
194
0
0
MCE is installed over XP Pro. It's 2 discs. The first disc is XP Pro. If you use a non-MCE key it'll install Pro normally. If you use an MCE key to install it'll prompt you for the second disc.
 

wexsmith

Member
Oct 7, 2004
194
0
0
So you've installed and used it then? Was it not two discs? Was the first disc not XP Pro SP2? Hmm...? :)
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
It is much harder than all of that. Yes, MCE 2005 is using the XP Core, as does Tablet 2005. If you are creating an OS install, you need the Mediactr and tablet containers in "cmpnents". Otherwise, there is only one other change, the product key. Same setup, same everything but the product key. You use the same setup commands, but you just point to a different unattend.txt file with the product key for Tablet, MCE, or XP Pro.

And for reference, this all unified with SP2.
 

wexsmith

Member
Oct 7, 2004
194
0
0
Well I've not noticed any differences between XP Pro SP2 and XP Pro SP2 with MCE. My desktop and my HTPC are running each respectively. If there are differences they're so minor that most people wont even notice them, I haven't. Now my wife's notebook running Home is definitely different, especially in the networking portion. :p
 

stash

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2000
5,468
0
0
Was the first disc not XP Pro SP2? Hmm...?

I have two MCE machines at home, but whether I've used it or not is irrelevant. The first disc is not XP Pro.
 

wexsmith

Member
Oct 7, 2004
194
0
0
Originally posted by: STaSh
Was the first disc not XP Pro SP2? Hmm...?

I have two MCE machines at home, but whether I've used it or not is irrelevant. The first disc is not XP Pro.

Sorry, I was referring to MCE 2005. I should have been aware that people are still using 2004...
 

stash

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2000
5,468
0
0
Sorry, I was referring to MCE 2005. I should have been aware that people are still using 2004...

I never said anything about 2004. MCE 2005 is an XP SKU. It is not 'based' on anything, except XP. Not Pro or Home.
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Originally posted by: STaSh
Sorry, I was referring to MCE 2005. I should have been aware that people are still using 2004...

I never said anything about 2004. MCE 2005 is an XP SKU. It is not 'based' on anything, except XP. Not Pro or Home.
It is based off of Pro from what I have seen in all the VLA code. It starts with Pro with the Non-OEM version.
 

sparkyclarky

Platinum Member
May 3, 2002
2,389
0
0
Both Home, Pro, and by extension MCE support dual core processors. Two complete physically separate CPUs is only supported by Pro (and perhaps MCE, but I'm not sure on that).
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
Originally posted by: Markbnj
I don't believe this is true. First, Windows doesn't know whether you have multiple processors or multiple cores: multiple cores look just like multiple processors to the system. Second, Microsoft states in a number of places that XP Pro supports multiple processors while XP Home does not. I haven't been able to find specific information about MCE, but I am guessing it does not, as it is built on XP Home.

Your post (I'm afraid) is wrong on both points. The system most certainly makes a distinction between muti-cores and multi-procs. They do not 'just look like' the same thing to the OS. Home supports multi-core and HT, not multi-proc. Pro supports multi-proc in addition (so each of the physical procs can have multiple cores and/or HT support).

MCE follows XP Pro's CPU licensing. MCE, however is built on the XP core, there is no concept as to it's built on Home or it's built on Pro (as other people in this thread have pointed out, and I've had to mention about weekly lately ;))

Bill
 

wexsmith

Member
Oct 7, 2004
194
0
0
Well, I dunno about the discs you guys are using. The two MCE 2005 discs I have are labeled as Windows XP Professional SP2 and Windows MCE 2005 Edition. The only thing I've seen that leans to it not being based on Pro is the lack of domain support. Other than that it's installed with a copy of Windows Professional under it.
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
Originally posted by: wexsmith
Well, I dunno about the discs you guys are using. The two MCE 2005 discs I have are labeled as Windows XP Professional SP2 and Windows MCE 2005 Edition. The only thing I've seen that leans to it not being based on Pro is the lack of domain support. Other than that it's installed with a copy of Windows Professional under it.

Doesn't matter what the disk says, the Home and Pro bits (for example) are identical (Pro disk includes a few more things which are installed, but the primary stuff doesnt change). What does change is the license (which isn't some legal click thru, for MCE some of the restrictions are enforced by code which checks the version speifically to see if it's MCE or not)

In addition to domain, you also don't have cached credentials (unless your a MCE 2004 upgrade).

Bill
 

wexsmith

Member
Oct 7, 2004
194
0
0
So, do you know if these same restrictions are applied to the cached credentials if MCE is installed on Windows 2003 Server?
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
Originally posted by: wexsmith
So, do you know if these same restrictions are applied to the cached credentials if MCE is installed on Windows 2003 Server?

That makes as much sense as asking if Home can be installed on 2003 server. MCE is a flavor of XP, not just an option pack. It's not licesned for install on 2003 server (the installer prevents it). I'm sure it could be hacked, but thats not a topic we'll discuss here.
 

minofifa

Senior member
May 19, 2004
485
0
0
when configuring my dell laptop, i have the option of XP MCE for $40, or XP PRO for $150. I don't see how MCE could be pro if they are selling it for $100 less. Maybe this is more of a licencing/price issue, i dunno
 

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
Well I have been through a bunch of the MS site and canno find anything indicating how MCE reacts to multiple processors compared to multiple cores. I do believe the multi-core is supported by all versions as a number of vendors sell XP/Home on X2 systems.

 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
VLA= Volume Licensing Agreement.

The code I have from MS is bundled in Pro. But, it is only a couple of DLLs and EXEs that make Home and Pro different. I would suspect that with a little tweaking, MS could have all flavors install from the same source DVD (2 CD set) just using a different product ID. Remember that price does not determine what it is. MS wants to sell MCE and will do it at a bargin help them become the 'standard' in HTPC. I would suspect that MCE 2005 supports the same processor options as Pro (X86). I have not paid enough attention to it to see if there is even a 64bit option. Considering some of the components, I would doubt it.