About as dumb as obama being able to claim there have been no terrorist attacks because he refuses to aim anything as terrorism. Like he repeatedly refuses to call benghazi terrorism.
Not quite as dumb as continuing to make stupid, absolutely proven wrong time and time again statements.
"Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe," he said. "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."
-Obama, September 12, 2012
I mean, if your derangement system is strong, in place, and holding strong, I guess you could spin it by saying that Obama literally said, "no acts of terror" when discussing Benghazi(!) on September 12th, the very next day... but it would be just as honest as the whole "Obama said you didn't build that" out-of-context statement that only faith-based conservatism could take as a reflection of observable reality.
Then again, given how conservatives rely on conjuring phrases to express their political opinions, I guess that since Obama didn't say the magical conjuring word "terrorism" and instead said "act of terror", that Obama is, of course, unwilling to describe the Benghazi attack as "terrorism", since that exact word wasn't used. I'm guessing because freedom, but of course and, very appropriately, Benghazi.