is it worth swtching to Windows XP 64 bit?

Cha0s

Banned
Nov 30, 2004
725
0
0
is it worth swtching to Windows XP 64 bit? i currently have WinXP Pro, and everything runs smooth.
Is 64bit stable, and are there any new features?
 

CALIKUSH

Member
Sep 3, 2004
113
0
0
If you are happy with xp pro then stick with it, If you feel like living on the cutting edge then go with x64 xp. The only real advantage is 64 bit programs. Theres not that many at the moment.
 

TheNiceGuy

Golden Member
Dec 23, 2004
1,569
3
81
And 64B is a bit of a beta (pardon the aliteration!). Lots of stability problems so far. Check out the Microsoft forums for more details of these. I'd wait a while till it gets mainstream, unless you're like a Harley owner and love tinkering on continual problems!
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
If money is no object and you enjoy technology for the sake of technology - buy it. But since there are very few 64-bit apps out there, I would say it is a bit premature at this time.
 

seattledesi

Member
Nov 16, 2004
87
0
0
stability problems - zero if you get the right drivers

compatibility problems - zero! 32-bit apps run as fast under x64.

64-bit apps! IE is 64-bit.. notepad too! :)
 

Bar81

Banned
Mar 25, 2004
1,835
0
0
No reason to switch, just dual boot and check it out. It's not ready to be your only OS atm.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
I'm dual booting right now with XP and XP-64. Are there any 64-bit apps for me to test?
 

user1234

Banned
Jul 11, 2004
2,428
0
0
Originally posted by: corkyg
If money is no object and you enjoy technology for the sake of technology - buy it. But since there are very few 64-bit apps out there, I would say it is a bit premature at this time.

xp-64 is avaialbe for free right now cause it's still "beta" - you can't buy it. But as many reviews have mentioned, since rc1 it's already very stable and works with most hardware, so you and especially the previous poster that paid a lot of money to get your primitive 32-bit when you could get the 64-bit for free......
I haven't yet installed all my games on it, but so far I have zero problems. SO I agree it's not really faster for 32-bit apps, it's just the same stupid windoze but at the right price this time.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
But as many reviews have mentioned, since rc1 it's already very stable and works with most hardware

Most hardware? You mean just hardware that MS ported drivers to and for what few manufacturers have released their on 64-bit drivers.

o you and especially the previous poster that paid a lot of money to get your primitive 32-bit when you could get the 64-bit for free.....

Primitive? It's the same f'ing thing, the differences are extremely minor which is why the betas have been so stable, there were virtually no code changes required.

SO I agree it's not really faster for 32-bit apps, it's just the same stupid windoze but at the right price this time.

If it's so stupid and overpriced why do you keep using it?
 

chaswood

Member
Oct 10, 2001
130
0
0
Originally posted by: seattledesi
stability problems - zero if you get the right drivers

compatibility problems - zero! 32-bit apps run as fast under x64.

64-bit apps! IE is 64-bit.. notepad too! :)

64 bit notepad! Should be blazing fast - time to switch!!

 

EndGame

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2002
1,276
0
0
xp-64 is avaialbe for free right now cause it's still "beta"

Hmm, this has been available since the 25th and several other places now have it also.....

Win XP 64 bit

Also, I'll agree with some other posts. I'm dual booting with it right now with all correct 64 bit drivers and it is completely stable. Running several games D3, COD, NASCAR Sim.....