Originally posted by: n7
You could, but it's by no means necessary.
the best dvd burner(nec) is only about $50
Originally posted by: CalvinHobbes
Some burners do rip slowly. Some have hacked firmwares that will support faster rip speeds. I use a Lite-on DVD-ROM with my NEC 3500A.
Originally posted by: wseyller
I use a NEC 3520A. It has a rip lock but I defeated that with hacked firmware and now rips at full speed. I don't see many instances where you would want to burn on the fly using two drives. The only beneficial reason I see is having a dvd rom to read and the burner to burn in only to help increase the life of your burner. But really though that is really pointless because the best dvd burner(nec) is only about $50 and by the time the drive wears out and goes bad if ever you may want to get a new one that is more upgraded.
Same Here.Originally posted by: DaFOBulous1
Yea, I have a DVD-ROM with my DVD-RW since DVD-ROMs are so cheap and I might as well reduce some wear for my DVD-RW.
Originally posted by: IeraseU
There are numerous reasons to have a DVD-ROM in addition to a DVD+/-RW.
-Coping from CD to CD on the fly.
-Watching a movie while the burner is ripping/burning.
-Greater compatibility (some disks read better on certain drives, with 2 drives you increase your chance of compatibility).
-Installing software on the DVD-ROM while burning or otherwise using the 2nd drive for something else
Numerous others of course, and a DVD-ROM is only about $20, so why not? I can see not doing it if you are building a compact HTPC type case which only allows you 1 optical drive, but on a standard computer case, I would want a DVD-ROM.
Originally posted by: bgc99
Should you get a DVD-Rom for ripping, in addition to your burner? I read somewhere that the burners weren't so good at ripping?
Thanks,
BGC
Originally posted by: CalvinHobbes
Some burners do rip slowly. Some have hacked firmwares that will support faster rip speeds. I use a Lite-on DVD-ROM with my NEC 3500A.