Well. At least he is congratulating soldiers on winning the Purple Heart. So that's good right?
Well. At least he is congratulating soldiers on winning the Purple Heart. So that's good right?
Is that real?
Yes, it is! He even called it "tremendous."
As I've heard it, soldiers generally aren't proud of Purple Hearts (there may be exceptions if they were wounded while doing something particularly heroic). It amounts to an enemy marksmanship badge.
AND..... the idiot said he was awarding it on behalf of himself and Melania. Not, you know, an appreciative nation.Yes, it is! He even called it "tremendous."
As I've heard it, soldiers generally aren't proud of Purple Hearts (there may be exceptions if they were wounded while doing something particularly heroic). It amounts to an enemy marksmanship badge.
Even if you discount everything Trump said up until he was sworn in, you knew he was going to be a terrible President when he made Sean Spicer call a press conference to lie about the size of the inauguration crowd.
I just don't know how anyone can defend Trump when it's obvious that he not only has an extremely fragile ego, but lets it dictate decisions where you absolutely need a cool head. It's like letting a spoiled, entitled 10-year-old run the country.
But it'll be funny! We already have entertainment in our news broadcasting. Why not in our president??It's like letting a spoiled, entitled 10-year-old run the country.
At this rate I think there is sadly a high probability of them unbanning the flying pig than there is of Trump becoming a top notch President.No.
You can change your mind later if he becomes non-terrible. And/or when pigs fly.
No.
You can change your mind later if he becomes non-terrible. And/or when pigs fly.
But here's the thing. He doesn't strike me as an outsider. Before the election he struck me as an insider as deeply entrenched in Washington as humanly possible short of outright being a politician. He was the lobbyist that cut out the middle man and while Congress likely needed a fresh new perspective, Trump was not it in my opinion. Voting for Trump was a vote for "I'm tired of all these politicians in Washington bending to the will of the lobbyists. I'ma vote for a lobbyist and shake things up around here!"I'll be the outlier here and say that it is too early and I'll give you my reasoning for this.
Everyone knew he had zero experience in government and everyone thinks he's an outsider (specifically referring to Washington DC), so it should be expected that a new president with zero public sector experience would need to go through some growing pains. Right now, I'd argue his failures are due to exactly that, his inexperience. So I'll wait a little longer before I declare him a horrible president (which, I'm sure, is more than he deserves).
The counter argument to that, of course, is that if he possessed 1/10th of the competence he claims he has, he would have put into place and surrounded himself with people who are competent and who would have been able to, at the very least, put together a complete team.
I judge being president by a few factors: is he competent. Is he able to learn for his mistakes or acknowledge them.
Has his decisions/policies led to a fulfillment of his promises he made on the campaign trail?
Has his responses to crises produced positive results?
Has he improved US relations with other countries?
Those are the standards by which I can judge him while acknowledging that his policies are counter to mine and are unacceptable.