Is it just me or nfl.com is a steaming pile of cow dung?
- Thread starter SSSnail
- Start date
- Nov 29, 2006
- 17,458
- 83
- 86
DesiPower
Lifer
- Nov 22, 2008
- 15,299
- 740
- 126
You mean IE??? who the hell uses that? I have dig into program files to find that... please use real browsers to avoid fails...
- Nov 29, 2006
- 17,458
- 83
- 86
So you're using Firefox and have no issues, whatsoever? Do you have noscript as well or just the noob issued ABP?
zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 111,891
- 31,410
- 146
Krazy4Real
Lifer
- Oct 3, 2003
- 12,221
- 55
- 91
This. I've never had a problem watching any videos on the site. I don't see any ads either with adblock.
- Nov 29, 2006
- 17,458
- 83
- 86
heh, that's like watching every NFL broadcast on the telly!
:hmm: what you just pointed out, I see.
As for the people that are saying the site is fine...well, substandard is what you're used to.
Krazy4Real
Lifer
- Oct 3, 2003
- 12,221
- 55
- 91
- Nov 29, 2006
- 17,458
- 83
- 86
” let's design a website that runs smoothly for computers with 16GB of RAM”. Sure. So, are you using Firefox with noscript?
Kinda funny how I don't have any issues with any other websites, except nfl.com
Pulsar
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2003
- 5,224
- 306
- 126
heh, that's like watching every NFL broadcast on the telly!
I was watching the thursday night NFL game on the NFL network last night at the sports bar.
I could not believe that the NFL network doesn't show what down it is, and how many yards to go.
Being a sports bar, the audio was incomprehensible because of the noise. It doesn't really matter though. Not being able to show the most basic information on the screen makes watching the game nearly impossible.
Glad I'm not the only one that thinks NFL.com is a POS. It's slow even for my overclocked 4Ghz quadcore processor with 12GB of RAM.
This is exactly what happens when you don't hire the best people to do the job. They probably half assed and chose an agency not capable of producing a better site.
This is exactly what happens when you don't hire the best people to do the job. They probably half assed and chose an agency not capable of producing a better site.
Krazy4Real
Lifer
- Oct 3, 2003
- 12,221
- 55
- 91
- Nov 29, 2006
- 17,458
- 83
- 86
Krazy4Real
Lifer
- Oct 3, 2003
- 12,221
- 55
- 91
I use IE9, I actually prefer it, I used to use Chrome, tried Firefox. I know the in thing to do is to make fun of IE and show how cool you are by pointing out you use a non-MS browser, but not being in the cool club is just something I'll just have to live with.
IE9 has zero problems with the site for me. Video loaded in a few seconds, the page pops right up, etc. It does look a bit 'busy' for me, but from a functional standpoint it works fine on my computer with IE9.
ESPN has some content I want but the page loads are long, autoplay refuses to remain "off" and you get to watch one video (after sitting through an ad), then another ad, so on, I guess I shouldn't bitch, it is free and some stories I do want to read/watch so I just put up with it..
eits
Lifer
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter