Is it even worth putting these up for SETI?

AgaBoogaBoo

Lifer
Feb 16, 2003
26,108
5
81
I have two old systems, a celery 433 and a celery 766. I don't think they'd crank many WU's out, maybe one or two a day, is it even worth is to put SETI on them? If so, how many WU's a day do you think they could crunch?
 

Spacehead

Lifer
Jun 2, 2002
13,067
9,858
136
I had a 500mhz Celeron that averaged 13.5 hours per, so adjust a little from there. I guess it's up to you... i know some people run slower ones than that.
 

compudog

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2001
5,782
0
71
Should get 4 WU's per day from the two of them. 4/day=28/week=112/month=1344/year:Q
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
If every TeAmmate had those, that would be an additional 6,000 WU's per day! :D

But...it's up to you. If you feel that the electricity, or some other factor, isn't worth it, then you'll have to make that decision.

I have bought several motherboards/chips to replace PIII 550's running at home because of electricity usage....but...I'm running the new boards and PIII's also...:p
 

ProviaFan

Lifer
Mar 17, 2001
14,993
1
0
Originally posted by: Spacehead
I had a 500mhz Celeron that averaged 13.5 hours per, so adjust a little from there. I guess it's up to you... i know some people run slower ones than that.
Hmm, I have a 500MHz celery, but I thought it would be slower than that. More motivation to get it up and running, I guess... ;)
 

Spacehead

Lifer
Jun 2, 2002
13,067
9,858
136
Here's the complete stats for that computer, at least what i got logged:

500mhz Celeron
Windows 98se
256mb PC100 SDRAM
CLI(v3.03)/SETI Driver/SETI Spy
Fastest time- 10:51:38 (7.180 AR)
Slowest time- 20:37:56 (0.071 AR)
Average time for 342 WU's- 13:37:00

GUI(v3.03)
Average time for 217 WU's- 17:31:59