By definition you exist to fill a nonexistant vacancy... so, better if you weren't born at all.
It depends on the time spent "in the system." Newborns don't stay very long. OTOH, I've known folks who grew up in the system and were totally unable to function outside of a structured environment such as the military.
The adoption system blows. It takes 40-50k to adopt a child. That makes no damn sense. I wonder why so may spend their entire childhood in the adoption system
Sure, but your life continues after that...? Your life isn't defined by your usefulness to others at birth
This is an unanswerable question. For two reasons:
1) None of us have ever been not born. So we can't say what it feels like.
2) I'm willing to bet that most of us aren't adopted.
Aside from those, there are another few reasons why if it were answerable, it would be difficult to answer:
1) Most people don't remember their childhoods
2) Young children cannot distinguish fiction from reality purely on the basis of plausibility. This makes it difficult for children to evaluate their experience objectively, and it also makes it difficult to combine different evaluations of childhoods from different orphanages.
3) Orphanages obviously vary greatly, as with everything else.
Since you depend on others for your survival for at least the first decade, your life IS kinda defined by your usefulness to others.
Not to be too cynical... lol.
Fair enough, would they rather be dead than alive?
This. Three of my close relatives were put in the adoption system as babies. They turned out great. My neighbor had some foster kids that were older and they seemed very troubled.It depends on the time spent "in the system." Newborns don't stay very long. OTOH, I've known folks who grew up in the system and were totally unable to function outside of a structured environment such as the military.
They're unable to tell the difference.
This will blow your mind: My wife was adopted...and she's pro choice.
So would your wife rather have never been born that live the life she has had?
I'm guessing you don't know what the word choice means
What part of my post did you not understand?All true, but the purpose of the question is would you rather have spent the first part of your life in the adoption system or to have no life at all.
So would your wife rather have never been born that live the life she has had?
What part of my post did you not understand?
If she hadn't been born I would have had a different path than the one I followed. Nothing more...nothing less.
Where's the third option wishing that necktard hadn't been born?
They can't tell the difference between being alive and dead?
I'm asking what your wife would want, not how it would affect you.