Originally posted by: yourdeardaniel
no, then ppl in medical industry and related areas would be out of jobs
Hmm.. wouldn't those other areas all be filled with the people who are no longer sick??Originally posted by: Continuity28
Originally posted by: yourdeardaniel
no, then ppl in medical industry and related areas would be out of jobs
So have them relocate to other areas... 😛
Originally posted by: joedrake
Ooo then we can live like in The Giver.
I liked it, but I don't like the ending. DID HE DIE OR NOT? DID HE MAKE IT TO CIVILIZATION? :Q 🙁Originally posted by: ni4ni
Originally posted by: joedrake
Ooo then we can live like in The Giver.
Awesome awesome book!
Originally posted by: DAWeinG
No. Overpopulation would end us all.
Originally posted by: DAWeinG
No. Overpopulation would end us all.
Originally posted by: Lenine
I'm gonna laugh when all the people who say no get AIDS and cancer and some other nasty diseases simultaneously. There may be problems with the disappearance of sickness, but they are definitely a decent trade off. Arguing any other way (loss of jobs, overpopulation, et cetera) just makes you look stupid.
Originally posted by: Continuity28
Originally posted by: DAWeinG
No. Overpopulation would end us all.
With all the freed up workers, you can perhaps do research into space - and expand off of the planet? There's lots of possibilities really...