Question.
By definition,'intelligent' seems to be fairly absolute in it's meaning. Basically it's an ability to reason, etc.
I understand that someone can be more/less intelligent than someone else.
But let's say you are in a group of 4 people and you have an IQ of 80, and the others IQ's of 100,120,150, etc. (i forget the IQ range).
Someone is arguing that if you are the person with the much lower IQ, relative to the others, you aren't intelligent.
I think that's wrong. You may have less intelligence, but you would still be considered intelligent, correct? For the same reason 'intelligent life' has a fairly agreed upon scientific definition and that life is either intelligent, or it isn't.
By definition,'intelligent' seems to be fairly absolute in it's meaning. Basically it's an ability to reason, etc.
I understand that someone can be more/less intelligent than someone else.
But let's say you are in a group of 4 people and you have an IQ of 80, and the others IQ's of 100,120,150, etc. (i forget the IQ range).
Someone is arguing that if you are the person with the much lower IQ, relative to the others, you aren't intelligent.
I think that's wrong. You may have less intelligence, but you would still be considered intelligent, correct? For the same reason 'intelligent life' has a fairly agreed upon scientific definition and that life is either intelligent, or it isn't.