- Jul 25, 2006
- 1,202
- 2
- 81
I'm getting a new motherboard (P5N-D), and am moving from socket 939 to 775.
I was wondering if Intel is expected to lower prices on 45nm chips in the next week or two.
I'm not sure which cpu to get either. I definitely want a 45nm part, from the heat/electrical perspective, as well as overclocking potential.
Right now, I'm looking at the e7200 or the e8400. But if Intel is going to release lower binned 45nm parts, I'd jump on that ( E2XXX, E4XXX type).
I record tv on two tuners, play some games (CSS and Civ), but may play more demanding games in the future. Besides that, I pretty much just surf the web, and use the desktop for media- nothing all that intensive.
I like the E7200, from the overclocking perspective, because of the 1066 FSB and higher multiplier, but I'm unsure of the impact of half the cache on my current uses, and any future ones.
I might not overclock if stock speeds show a huge improvement over my current s939 X2 overclocked to 2.6ghz from stock 2ghz. I expect with either choice the difference should be pronounced. I don't plan on overclocking for the hell of it, and running the cpu at max stable and higher volts only to outstrip my needs.
Is it feasible to run the E7200 st 3ghz and be able to undervolt it?
Is the $50 difference worth the additional 3mb L2, faster FSB (which I guess could be a detriment), and stock speed? What typical undervolts could be expected from an E7200 @ 3ghz vs a stock E8400? Cache aside, is there any performance difference between the two at 3ghz?
I see newegg has the E7200 @ ~$120, and the E8400 @ ~$170. Anywhere where these might be cheaper? If I run at stock speeds the warranty would be nice, but I plan on getting an aftermarket cooler, so I guess the warranty is voided anyhow. Because of a cooler, I don't care much about OEM vs retail.
Input/advice/guidance/experience?
Cheers,
Popnfresh
I was wondering if Intel is expected to lower prices on 45nm chips in the next week or two.
I'm not sure which cpu to get either. I definitely want a 45nm part, from the heat/electrical perspective, as well as overclocking potential.
Right now, I'm looking at the e7200 or the e8400. But if Intel is going to release lower binned 45nm parts, I'd jump on that ( E2XXX, E4XXX type).
I record tv on two tuners, play some games (CSS and Civ), but may play more demanding games in the future. Besides that, I pretty much just surf the web, and use the desktop for media- nothing all that intensive.
I like the E7200, from the overclocking perspective, because of the 1066 FSB and higher multiplier, but I'm unsure of the impact of half the cache on my current uses, and any future ones.
I might not overclock if stock speeds show a huge improvement over my current s939 X2 overclocked to 2.6ghz from stock 2ghz. I expect with either choice the difference should be pronounced. I don't plan on overclocking for the hell of it, and running the cpu at max stable and higher volts only to outstrip my needs.
Is it feasible to run the E7200 st 3ghz and be able to undervolt it?
Is the $50 difference worth the additional 3mb L2, faster FSB (which I guess could be a detriment), and stock speed? What typical undervolts could be expected from an E7200 @ 3ghz vs a stock E8400? Cache aside, is there any performance difference between the two at 3ghz?
I see newegg has the E7200 @ ~$120, and the E8400 @ ~$170. Anywhere where these might be cheaper? If I run at stock speeds the warranty would be nice, but I plan on getting an aftermarket cooler, so I guess the warranty is voided anyhow. Because of a cooler, I don't care much about OEM vs retail.
Input/advice/guidance/experience?
Cheers,
Popnfresh