Is "I'd" a word?

BrianH1

Platinum Member
May 24, 2005
2,199
0
0
its a contraction. informal conversation its appropriate, but do not use it in formal writing.
 

loup garou

Lifer
Feb 17, 2000
35,132
1
81
Ugh...your post was better without that crappy IM log, take it back out. If I had known that stupid argument had spawned this request, I wouldn't have answered.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
44
91
Your friend is simply being over-technical and being a smart-arse. He's technically correct, he didn't say "would". He said something that had an exactly equivalent meaning, but he didn't actually say "would".

ZV
 

alcoholbob

Diamond Member
May 24, 2005
6,390
469
126
It's a word in informal useage, but not allowed in formal useage. However, it's still a word.

Think of having to dress up for work. Even though you can't wear your tye-dye shirt to work, it's still a shirt. It's just not a shirt for work.

To say a contraction is not a word is a selective bias based on individual ideosyncracies and environmental mores. It's still a signal for communication, a verbal composition, therefore it has to be word--unless it wasn't something in common useage. These things are a transitory thing. A while ago "bling" wasn't a word because of its limited social dispersion, but it's understood now and is in common useage. It is now a word.
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
people, he is asking if it is a word or not. contradictions are words. wouldn't couldn't etc. I suppose I'd is a word
 

KillerCharlie

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2005
3,691
68
91
"I'd" can be both "I would" or "I had." Similarly, "she'd" can be both "she would" and "she had." Look in the dictionary....