Sorry, your position -- national health care is a form of slavery -- was off. I just showed how absurd it was using your same "logic." The reality is in both cases the people delivering the service do so willingly and are paid accordingly. There is no slavery, not by any rational, non-partisan standard anyway. Trying to divert attention from your fallacy by pointing at me doesn't cut it. Can you defend your premise or not?
I'm not trying to divert, I think you're just not understanding my position, hence your off analogy.
You have the right to arm yourself, however, that does not mean you have the right to a gun provided to you
by the government AKA your fellow citizens.
In this same way, you have the liberty to
purchase health care.
Now, you say you have the right to healthcare itself, which means it must
be provided for you by your fellow citizens right?
Doctors, nurses, equipment, medicine must be paid for with something right?
So following your logic, this would mean that people have the right to
other peoples production -> slavery.
That is why it cannot be a human right.