Is Evolution really so "sure"?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BullsOnParade

Golden Member
Apr 7, 2003
1,259
0
0
Yazzim, you have to realize that there are other forms of reading
material aside from your dime store flesh mags, and you're in luck
as they do have some very nice illustrations to keep you from missing the point.

And Jittles, i dont think any of us are going to bother reading Mr. Safarti's book.
I can't find a single positive review that's not by some illiterate or at some bible thuming site.
However the criticisms rend the work assunder. I can all ready smell the bs from here.
 

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0
Originally posted by: Yzzim
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Skoorb, if your problem is lack of fossil evidence, then you should forget ever having "proof". The chance of an animal being fossilized is VERY thin. Judging from special cases resulting from unusual geomorphic events that preserve more animals than normal, 1/10,000 species that ever lived have been preserved as fossils. The fossil evidence that does exist more than proves that evolution happens, as if you couldn't see it right before your eyes anyway (see DrNoobie's post)..

uuhhh....where's the fossils?

The only fossil evidence I remember seeing turned out to be fake. Whether it was a genetically mutated human bone, or a bone from a pig, I don't think I've ever seen a "head to toe" skelecton of homo erectus et al

see link i posted earlier in thread