Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Yes, it's supposed to be through the security camera, hence the weird angle.
Originally posted by: Dudd
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Yes, it's supposed to be through the security camera, hence the weird angle.
Is that really the reason? I mean, it's still in b&w when they play hockey on the roof and drive to the funeral, instances where there is no security camera. I thought it was just a stylistic decision.
Originally posted by: Vic
![]()
You people realize that Clerks was Kevin Smith's first movie, was fully indy, and cost a mere $27,575 -- most of which came from Smith's personal credit cards?
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Yes, it's supposed to be through the security camera, hence the weird angle.
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: Vic
![]()
You people realize that Clerks was Kevin Smith's first movie, was fully indy, and cost a mere $27,575 -- most of which came from Smith's personal credit cards?
What's your point? You'd think we were all criticizing the movie or something...
Correct, well that and the fact that the thief watching the downloaded version said he was glad he didn't watch it in the theater...Originally posted by: LikeLinus
I think he's saying that to all the people say it was done to look like a security camera. Thats not the reason and false. It was done for budget reasons. All the people in the film were basically friends also.Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
What's your point? You'd think we were all criticizing the movie or something...Originally posted by: Vic
![]()
You people realize that Clerks was Kevin Smith's first movie, was fully indy, and cost a mere $27,575 -- most of which came from Smith's personal credit cards?