Is Chinese Trade Policy To Blame for US Trade Deficits?

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
As Presidencial Election nears, Bush Administration accused Chinese government of unfair trade practice and slapped tarrif on Chinese TV import. Is this a economic move or a political move?

This good artical gives an objective view of current Chinese/US trade relations


Indeed, the current U.S.-China trade imbalance is mostly a function of regional economic trends that benefit U.S. consumers with lower prices on everything from bras to laptops. Even if Beijing acceded to Washington's demands to immediately revalue its currency and comply with all WTO obligations, U.S-Chinese trade would remain lopsided for years, economists say.

"If China did everything exactly right ... people would be disappointed in terms of what the trade deficit would be. It might be slightly smaller," says Nicholas Lardy of the Institute for International Economics in Washington, D.C.


Lardy estimates that a 20% reduction in the value of the Chinese yuan, about the midpoint of critics' overvaluation claims, would trim $10 billion from the trade gap. If eliminating all protectionist measures produced a similar gain, the remaining deficit still would be enormous.


Likewise, recent high-profile Chinese agreements to buy more Boeing-made airplanes and to allow the import of 15,000 American-made cars will do little to shrink the shortfall. And the Bush administration's decision to slap quotas on fast-rising imports of Chinese-made textiles may spawn domestic political benefits, but it will barely register in the trade account.

....

The first steps went smoothly. Even before formally joining the WTO, China had begun reducing import tariffs, making goods from other countries more affordable. From a peak of 55% in the early days of China's economic opening, the average tariff has plunged to 11.5%. That has benefited U.S. companies such as Motorola, which expected to save $80 million in China's first year of WTO membership.

....

Still, the discontent shouldn't be overstated. Buried in the fine print of a 179-page Chamber report was a conclusion at odds with the headline: 50% of 254 member companies surveyed said China was on, or ahead of schedule in implementing the agreement vs. 38% that said it was lagging.

....

Chinese officials so far appear to be taking the U.S. criticism in stride, regarding it as the inevitable byproduct of the presidential election cycle. And they say China's leaders have their own protectionist constituencies to massage. "I think we have done our best," says Chen Baosen of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences' American Studies Institute.

Besides, the U.S. does not have an unblemished trade record. A WTO panel ruled earlier this month that tariffs imposed by the Bush administration on imported steel in March 2002 violated international trade accords. In a Nov. 9 speech in Suzhou, China, Caterpillar CEO Glen Barton, who plans to expand his company's investment here, said Washington needs to play by the same rules it urges upon others.

"Increasingly, we in the United States will be asking other countries, like China, to stand up to politically influential interests in order to make reforms that will open their markets to U.S. products," Barton said. "If the world's most competitive country isn't willing to play by the rules ... how can we expect other countries to do the same?"

In short, all these anti-Chinese trade headlines are, politic as usual.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
I dont know if it is possible for the US to not run a trade defecit. We are the wealthiest country in the world and that allows us to buy product from any other country. Less wealthy countries are not able to buy our products.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
I can summarize the major reason we have a trade deficit with one word: Walmart . . . and one sentence: Americans love to consume and much of what we consume is made somewhere else.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I can summarize the major reason we have a trade deficit with one word: Walmart . . . and one sentence: Americans love to consume and much of what we consume is made somewhere else.

If it was not walmart, it would be someone else.
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I can summarize the major reason we have a trade deficit with one word: Walmart . . . and one sentence: Americans love to consume and much of what we consume is made somewhere else.

If it was not walmart, it would be someone else.

Then hopefully the American people see through the politics played in the Capital Hills, and not start a trade war and damage the trade relationships with other countries just because it is the election years and it is the vote getting things to say.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
So now the excuse is . . .
somebody needs to fool American consumers into buying goods produced by poorly compensated labor and subsequently sold by poorly compensated labor (without health benefits) . . . so why shouldn't it be Walmart?!
 

ReiAyanami

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2002
4,466
0
0
the reason why the trade deficit is so high with china is because we won't export high technology to them. we could eliminate the deficit by selling them sohphisticated dual use technology items that are 30 years ahead of their time, but then they'd probably have a missle shield before us....

they may be our #1 trading partner, but they are still our *enemy*

our #1 product is technology. their's is manual labor.