Is Bush a tool?

homercles337

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2004
6,340
3
71
Why did a catergory 3 hurricane headed to texas refineries receive more federal support from the vacationing president than the poor in New Orleans? Bush was in texas BEFORE Rita hit, but he's on vacation/photo ops for days after the category 5 Katrina? Are there obvious priorties here? If not, something more than oped pieces (or your own opion) would be nice.
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
The repug answer will be that he learned from Katrina... but this is a man who hasn't even learned how to say "nuclear" after 5 years of coaching, I think even learning to tie his shoes would be a bit beyond him. You already stated the true & obvious answer.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
And the circle jerk begins.

Liberals on the attack. Was expected.

Bush was damned if he did, damned if he didn't on this one.
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
And the circle jerk begins.

Liberals on the attack. Was expected.

Bush was damned if he did, damned if he didn't on this one.

I'm not a liberal. People from all walks of life and all political outlooks hate Bush, and rightly so.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: RBachman
I'm not a liberal. People from all walks of life and all political outlooks hate Bush, and rightly so.

Yep, and they all act like little kids on internet message boards ...
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: RBachman
I'm not a liberal. People from all walks of life and all political outlooks hate Bush, and rightly so.

Yep, and they all act like little kids on internet message boards ...

You hate Bush? :confused:
 

homercles337

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2004
6,340
3
71
Originally posted by: Pabster
And the circle jerk begins.

Liberals on the attack. Was expected.

Bush was damned if he did, damned if he didn't on this one.

No, bush was damned because he didn't in New Orleans. "Youre doing a hell of a job Brownie." Rember that? Rember that he was on vacation for days after Katrina hit despite YEARS of warnings (and dont give me any of that "working vacation" sh!t. Clearing brush on your land is not being "presidunt," "fightin' terra," or being a leader)?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: RBachman
Originally posted by: Pabster
And the circle jerk begins.

Liberals on the attack. Was expected.

Bush was damned if he did, damned if he didn't on this one.
I'm not a liberal. People from all walks of life and all political outlooks hate Bush, and rightly so.
You're attempting to argue with someone who is nothing but a disrupter up here. A likely Freeper/RNC Team Load toadie with no critical thinking skills whatsoever.

I have no problem with the President getting involved earlier this time. Rita could have been a very bad storm but it weakened before landfall. There was some political posturing as his trip was originally to be to San Antonio but it was "too sunny" there and wouldn't give the impression the President was dealing with an oncoming storm.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: homercles337
No, bush was damned because he didn't in New Orleans. "Youre doing a hell of a job Brownie." Rember that? Rember that he was on vacation for days after Katrina hit despite YEARS of warnings (and dont give me any of that "working vacation" sh!t. Clearing brush on your land is not being "presidunt," "fightin' terra," or being a leader)?

As if you have the slightest idea what the President does at his Ranch. Of course you'd like to believe he is hunting and cutting down brush all day <sigh>

The only "tool" here are those who've shown themselves to be just that.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: homercles337
No, bush was damned because he didn't in New Orleans. "Youre doing a hell of a job Brownie." Rember that? Rember that he was on vacation for days after Katrina hit despite YEARS of warnings (and dont give me any of that "working vacation" sh!t. Clearing brush on your land is not being "presidunt," "fightin' terra," or being a leader)?

As if you have the slightest idea what the President does at his Ranch. Of course you'd like to believe he is hunting and cutting down brush all day <sigh>

The only "tool" here are those who've shown themselves to be just that.
Also it's those whom the Bub appointed that screwed the pooch. Bush being in the Whitehouse or in Crawford wouldn't have mattered as the mistake was made many months prior to the disaster.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: homercles337
No, bush was damned because he didn't in New Orleans. "Youre doing a hell of a job Brownie." Rember that? Rember that he was on vacation for days after Katrina hit despite YEARS of warnings (and dont give me any of that "working vacation" sh!t. Clearing brush on your land is not being "presidunt," "fightin' terra," or being a leader)?
As if you have the slightest idea what the President does at his Ranch. Of course you'd like to believe he is hunting and cutting down brush all day <sigh>

The only "tool" here are those who've shown themselves to be just that.
Which you do with each and every one of your posts.
 

slyedog

Senior member
Jan 12, 2001
934
0
0
dammed if you do and dammed if you dont. well that is a politicians life. i know texas learned a lot from katrinia, but they were near perfect in dealing with rita. just about every person evacuated like they were told, very little looting and that was in lake charles, la., no shooting at the rescuers and people helping themselves to safety.
 

yankeesfan

Diamond Member
Aug 6, 2004
5,922
1
71
Originally posted by: Pabster
And the circle jerk begins.

Liberals on the attack. Was expected.

Bush was damned if he did, damned if he didn't on this one.

Now where was that thread where people were completely refuting the fact that this would happen?
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
the reason bush jumped on the 2nd hurricane was he caught so much flak for missing the last one. just more grandstanding by another politician.
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
And the circle jerk begins.

Liberals on the attack. Was expected.

Bush was damned if he did, damned if he didn't on this one.

As if there was any doubt this was intended to be a circle-jerk thread. Is there anything to even discuss about this issue when it is put in such a trollish post?
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
As if there was any doubt this was intended to be a circle-jerk thread. Is there anything to even discuss about this issue when it is put in such a trollish post?

:thumbsup:

The usual suspects have hijacked the thread, per usual. But I suspect it was intended that way.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Which you do with each and every one of your posts.

Chee, what a surprise. Conjur resorting to personal attacks / insults when he has absolutely nothing else. You've shown to everyone just how big of a tool you really are, once again. Congratulations!
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: conjur
Which you do with each and every one of your posts.

Chee, what a surprise. Conjur resorting to personal attacks / insults when he has absolutely nothing else. You've shown to everyone just how big of a tool you really are, once again. Congratulations!
Observations are person attacks? Damn, you're a thin-skinned Freeper, ain't ya?
 

sixone

Lifer
May 3, 2004
25,030
5
61
Originally posted by: homercles337
Why did a catergory 3 hurricane headed to texas refineries receive more federal support from the vacationing president than the poor in New Orleans? Bush was in texas BEFORE Rita hit, but he's on vacation/photo ops for days after the category 5 Katrina? Are there obvious priorties here? If not, something more than oped pieces (or your own opion) would be nice.

Nearly everyone, including Bush, put their faith in the local yokels in NOLA, and trusted that they would take care of their own. That didn't happen, so Bush can't sit around and wait for another local failure that he can take the blame for.

Yes, he's a politician first, and has to cover his own ass, but he also has to protect the reputation and effectiveness of the federal government. Which is now expected to provide first responders to any disaster, instead of backing up the local folks who really know what's going on.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: sixone
Originally posted by: homercles337
Why did a catergory 3 hurricane headed to texas refineries receive more federal support from the vacationing president than the poor in New Orleans? Bush was in texas BEFORE Rita hit, but he's on vacation/photo ops for days after the category 5 Katrina? Are there obvious priorties here? If not, something more than oped pieces (or your own opion) would be nice.
Nearly everyone, including Bush, put their faith in the local yokels in NOLA, and trusted that they would take care of their own. That didn't happen, so Bush can't sit around and wait for another local failure that he can take the blame for.
Ah...more of the Blame Game pointing fingers at the wrong people. FEMA was just Johnny-on-the-spot as they told the "local yokels" they would be when the "local yokels" realized they were going to be overwhelmed by the storm and were requesting help.

Yes, he's a politician first, and has to cover his own ass, but he also has to protect the reputation and effectiveness of the federal government. Which is now expected to provide first responders to any disaster, instead of backing up the local folks who really know what's going on.
He's not a politician. He's a front for the Rovian machine. And, you might want to check FEMA's website to see that even they state that in Federal disasters they are the primary responders.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: RBachman
I'm not a liberal.
Originally posted by: RBachman
I'm not a liberal.
Originally posted by: RBachman
That clearly implies that I must be a liberal, since only a liberal could possibly dislike Bush.
Originally posted by: RBachman
I don't know what else to do, you call me a liberal,
Originally posted by: RBachman
I'm not a lib/dem/lw'er,

Originally posted by: Gertrude (via Shakespeare)
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: RBachman
I'm not a liberal.
Originally posted by: RBachman
I'm not a liberal.
Originally posted by: RBachman
That clearly implies that I must be a liberal, since only a liberal could possibly dislike Bush.
Originally posted by: RBachman
I don't know what else to do, you call me a liberal,
Originally posted by: RBachman
I'm not a lib/dem/lw'er,

Originally posted by: Gertrude (via Shakespeare)
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

What about it? I keep getting labelled one since I don't like Bush and the Holy War. Those of the limited mental capacity required to support him are mostly entirely unable to comprehend this, they only understand very basic 'rules', like "Bush good" and "Anti-Bush/War lib".