Originally posted by: harpoon84
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: harpoon84
Originally posted by: Drift3r
What would be a better deal ? AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000 vs Core 2 Duo E6600 in pricing and performance?
According to the article that I linked, the E6600 is superior in all areas - performance, price, power consumption and overclocking.
The article in the one area I care the most "gaming" says the AMD 6000 edges out the E6600.
Are we looking at the same article?
http://xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/dualcore-roundup_4.html are the gaming benchmarks
At stock speeds, it's basically a tie in gaming, with the E6600 winning 4/8 tests and the X2 6000+ taking out the other 4/8.
Of course once overclocking is taken into account, C2D is streets ahead. Even a lowly E4300 @ 3.2GHz will easily beat an X2 @ 3.2GHz, let alone the 4MB L2 E6600 @ 3.5GHz.
Now, your sig indicates you are an overclocker, so I don't see how an X2 6000+ is in any way superior to the E6600? It consumes twice as much power (125W vs 65W), costs slightly more, and has next to no overclocking headroom.
Looking at Anandtech's own review,
http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2933&p=8 , the E6600 beats the X2 6000+ in 3/4 games, albeit by very slight margins. Again, this is at stock speeds. Overclocked, nothing from AMD can come remotely close to C2D at this point.