Fern
Elite Member
- Sep 30, 2003
- 26,907
- 174
- 106
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304830704577493032619987956.html
Present trends don't seem to bear that out.
Rural flight has also been a known problem for many years.
I don't think your article supports your assertions.
According to Census data released Thursday, in 27 of the nation's 51 largest metropolitan areas, city centers grew faster than suburbs between July 2010 and July 2011. By contrast, from 2000 to 2010 only five metro areas saw their cores grow faster than the surrounding suburbs.
Viewed as a whole, U.S. suburbs have grown faster than city centers in every decade since the 1920s, when rising automobile ownership inspired Americans to begin fleeing cramped city quarters for leafy suburbs, said William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution.
A year or so urban areas grew faster? Well, that's not much of a trend and I think most of it has to do with the economy and the housing market in particular.
I live in what could be considered a rural area. I moved here in the early 90's and we've been growing like crazy, at least until the economy and housing market tanked.
Simply put - if you cannot sell your old home, where ever it may be, you can't buy one here/move here. And if you got foreclosed on where ever you lived, you sure as heck aren't getting loan to buy a home here so you're not moving here.
Fern