- Oct 20, 2014
- 6,895
- 5,832
- 136
I remember in the R9 200 series AMD had huge problems with driver overhead when using lower end cpus. It was so bad I remember Digital Foundry doing a video with an i3-4130 + GTX 750 Ti outperforming an i3-4130 + R9 280 by an embarrassing margin in one of the COD games, and this showed up in many other AAA games as well. Which is crazy since 750 Ti was always a very low end card while R9 280 was a pretty good midrange card at the time. I ask because I'm looking to buy a gpu before the year ends, but my cpu is a little towards the lower end now (Xeon E3-1231v3, basically an i7-4770 non-K minus 100 MHz). And I'm not going to replace the cpu yet. I was kind of sold on the GTX 1660 Super for $230 until seeing how RDR2 devours that gpu, so I'm worried that 1660 Super would also get wrecked by Cyberpunk and Dying Light 2 next year. So now I'm thinking I should probably go a little higher with an RX 5700, RTX 2060 Super, or RTX 2070. My psu is a little low power for looking at the RX 5700 XT (it's a Bitfenix Formula 450 Gold ). Now from benchmarks and prices 5700 seems like the obvious choice, but I'm worried about the driver overhead being a problem like it known to be in the GCN cards. Does anyone know if this is a problem with current gen AMD gpus?