- Jun 10, 2011
- 291
- 0
- 0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duV6sdcfWhc&feature=channel_video_title
i think he makes most conspiracy theorists look like geniuses.
i think he makes most conspiracy theorists look like geniuses.
is alex jones the dumbest nutjob ever
- Thread starter cutforscience
- Start date
- Status
- Jun 10, 2011
- 291
- 0
- 0
- Jun 10, 2011
- 291
- 0
- 0
We already have NAFTA/GATT and the now discontinued Trans-Texas Corridor Project. The next step was to create a North American Union, confirmed by the latest Wikileaks. The world has already seen the European Union and the Euro created under the Treaty of Maastricht in 1993. Certainly makes the claims of a one-world government seem a little more plausible.
"A secret U.S. embassy cable from 2005 released on April 28 by the anti-secrecy group Wiki-Leaks confirms what The New American magazine and others have been reporting for years: North American governments are indeed plotting to “integrate” the continent. And not even including implementing the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), they’ve been working on it for at least six years, probably more.
So far, however, the bombshell has barely attracted any attention in the United States, Canada, or Mexico beyond a few mentions in some liberty-minded Internet forums and a TNA online article posted on May 2. But among patriots who have been opposing the integration efforts only to be dismissed as “conspiracy theorists,” the leaked cable provides more concrete proof that the plan is real, dangerous, and more than a recent or transient phenomenon.
The official document, signed by then-American Ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci, outlines the best ways to peddle the scheme to policymakers and the public. Most alarming to critics, it also discusses ways of getting around national constitutions and even the possibility of an eventual “monetary union.” Numerous other topics are broached in the leaked document, too: borders, labor, regulations, and more. But how to push the integration agenda is featured particularly prominently.
“Integrating” the United States, Canada, and Mexico
Integration is a little-used term employed mainly by policy wonks. But while it may sound relatively harmless, it generally describes a very serious phenomenon when used in a geopolitical context — the gradual merging of separate countries under a regional authority. Similar processes are already well under way in Europe, Africa, and South America. And according to critics, the results — essentially abolishing national sovereignty in favor of supranational, unaccountable governance — have been an unmitigated disaster.
“The European Union has effectively destroyed the independence of its 27 member nations. The plan to create what critics have dubbed a North American Union (NAU) is a huge step toward accomplishing for our nation and its neighbors what the EU has done in Europe,” said John F. McManus, president of The John Birch Society, which has been at the forefront of sounding the alarm about the integration plan. “If successful, the promoters of the NAU will cancel the U.S. Declaration of Independence and bore a huge hole in the U.S. Constitution. This must not be permitted.”
But the insiders in the U.S. government think otherwise. In North America, integration has been proceeding rapidly for years. In 2006, The New American was among the first to report on the efforts to submerge Canada, the United States, and Mexico in what opponents called a “North American Union.” In a special issue dedicated to the subject, a series of articles laid out every facet of the plan; its similarities to the European integration model; the planned “NAFTA Super Highway”; and finally, the end game — a world of supranational regional governments eventually merged into a United Nations-supervised global government.
The special issue attracted a great deal of attention. Over one million copies, in both physical and electronic form, were distributed across America. Finally, even some TV commentators such as then-CNN’s Lou Dobbs exposed the subject, too. The integration plans eventually faded to the back burner of public consciousness, with an occasional smear against those who acknowledged that the plan even existed. But more recently, the topic has received a little more attention — especially in Canada. And even though documents leaked earlier this year revealed that governments were trying to keep the process under wraps, integration is now proceeding out in the open for the most part.
The Cable
Written in 2005, the cable released recently by WikiLeaks explains how “integration” should proceed. And looking back, the document is right on the mark. The best way forward, it argues, is via gradual steps.
Under the subject line “Placing a new North American Initiative in its economic policy context,” American diplomatic personnel in Canada say they believe the slow and steady path is best. “An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers,” the cable states in its summary. Apparently Canadian economists agree.
How integration backers should peddle the scheme is seemingly one of the primary purposes of the document. The cable touts, for example, the supposed benefits of merging the three countries — intended to be essentially “talking points” to sell the plan. It even mentions which elements of the plan to “stress” in future “efforts to promote further integration.”
“Our research leads us to conclude that such a package should tackle both ‘security’ and ‘prosperity’ goals,” the document claims, using the two key words that have been emphasized at every step along the way. “This fits the recommendations of Canadian economists who have assessed the options for continental integration.”
Toward the end, the cable offers more advice on how to advance the integration agenda by tailoring the narrative. “When advocating [the North American Initiative to integrate the three countries], it would be better to highlight specific gains to individual firms, industries or travelers, and especially consumers,” the cable states, noting that it’s harder to “estimate the benefits” on a national or continental scale."
Read the rest here:http://www.thenewamerican.com/world...ks-confirms-north-american-integration-scheme
"A secret U.S. embassy cable from 2005 released on April 28 by the anti-secrecy group Wiki-Leaks confirms what The New American magazine and others have been reporting for years: North American governments are indeed plotting to “integrate” the continent. And not even including implementing the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), they’ve been working on it for at least six years, probably more.
So far, however, the bombshell has barely attracted any attention in the United States, Canada, or Mexico beyond a few mentions in some liberty-minded Internet forums and a TNA online article posted on May 2. But among patriots who have been opposing the integration efforts only to be dismissed as “conspiracy theorists,” the leaked cable provides more concrete proof that the plan is real, dangerous, and more than a recent or transient phenomenon.
The official document, signed by then-American Ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci, outlines the best ways to peddle the scheme to policymakers and the public. Most alarming to critics, it also discusses ways of getting around national constitutions and even the possibility of an eventual “monetary union.” Numerous other topics are broached in the leaked document, too: borders, labor, regulations, and more. But how to push the integration agenda is featured particularly prominently.
“Integrating” the United States, Canada, and Mexico
Integration is a little-used term employed mainly by policy wonks. But while it may sound relatively harmless, it generally describes a very serious phenomenon when used in a geopolitical context — the gradual merging of separate countries under a regional authority. Similar processes are already well under way in Europe, Africa, and South America. And according to critics, the results — essentially abolishing national sovereignty in favor of supranational, unaccountable governance — have been an unmitigated disaster.
“The European Union has effectively destroyed the independence of its 27 member nations. The plan to create what critics have dubbed a North American Union (NAU) is a huge step toward accomplishing for our nation and its neighbors what the EU has done in Europe,” said John F. McManus, president of The John Birch Society, which has been at the forefront of sounding the alarm about the integration plan. “If successful, the promoters of the NAU will cancel the U.S. Declaration of Independence and bore a huge hole in the U.S. Constitution. This must not be permitted.”
But the insiders in the U.S. government think otherwise. In North America, integration has been proceeding rapidly for years. In 2006, The New American was among the first to report on the efforts to submerge Canada, the United States, and Mexico in what opponents called a “North American Union.” In a special issue dedicated to the subject, a series of articles laid out every facet of the plan; its similarities to the European integration model; the planned “NAFTA Super Highway”; and finally, the end game — a world of supranational regional governments eventually merged into a United Nations-supervised global government.
The special issue attracted a great deal of attention. Over one million copies, in both physical and electronic form, were distributed across America. Finally, even some TV commentators such as then-CNN’s Lou Dobbs exposed the subject, too. The integration plans eventually faded to the back burner of public consciousness, with an occasional smear against those who acknowledged that the plan even existed. But more recently, the topic has received a little more attention — especially in Canada. And even though documents leaked earlier this year revealed that governments were trying to keep the process under wraps, integration is now proceeding out in the open for the most part.
The Cable
Written in 2005, the cable released recently by WikiLeaks explains how “integration” should proceed. And looking back, the document is right on the mark. The best way forward, it argues, is via gradual steps.
Under the subject line “Placing a new North American Initiative in its economic policy context,” American diplomatic personnel in Canada say they believe the slow and steady path is best. “An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers,” the cable states in its summary. Apparently Canadian economists agree.
How integration backers should peddle the scheme is seemingly one of the primary purposes of the document. The cable touts, for example, the supposed benefits of merging the three countries — intended to be essentially “talking points” to sell the plan. It even mentions which elements of the plan to “stress” in future “efforts to promote further integration.”
“Our research leads us to conclude that such a package should tackle both ‘security’ and ‘prosperity’ goals,” the document claims, using the two key words that have been emphasized at every step along the way. “This fits the recommendations of Canadian economists who have assessed the options for continental integration.”
Toward the end, the cable offers more advice on how to advance the integration agenda by tailoring the narrative. “When advocating [the North American Initiative to integrate the three countries], it would be better to highlight specific gains to individual firms, industries or travelers, and especially consumers,” the cable states, noting that it’s harder to “estimate the benefits” on a national or continental scale."
Read the rest here:http://www.thenewamerican.com/world...ks-confirms-north-american-integration-scheme
So anyone who thinks outside of the box is stupid? And those who follow the news, and abide by and believe everything they are told, are what?
Don't be so naive, nobody likes to be told that everything they hear and see isn't real. When religious folk are told god doesn't exist or hear anybody comment on other possible explanations, they instantly become defensive and plug their ears. Same thing with folk who think everything they hear and see on the news is 100 percent truth, once someone tells them something different they instantly call them crazy.
Don't be so naive, nobody likes to be told that everything they hear and see isn't real. When religious folk are told god doesn't exist or hear anybody comment on other possible explanations, they instantly become defensive and plug their ears. Same thing with folk who think everything they hear and see on the news is 100 percent truth, once someone tells them something different they instantly call them crazy.
Doppel
Lifer
- Feb 5, 2011
- 13,306
- 3
- 0
I have, but if that's any reason to call him a nut job then I wonder how far fetched his theories must be to reality. He questions reality as a whole, and not much people want to do that, everyone is so caught up in their own little bubble that thinking outside of that bubble would be disastrous. Maybe he's a gimmick, maybe he's trying to cash in on "gullible" people. I my self find it refreshing to listen and read something other than CNN every now and then.
Doppel
Lifer
- Feb 5, 2011
- 13,306
- 3
- 0
If you've watched his shows either you know he has a demented view of reality or you have one and sympathize with him. As some people don't question anything he questions everything. Everything is a conspiracy and everything is going to kill you and destroy America. infowars.com has all his articles, it's endless conspiracy theories. Endless. He sows fear in his listeners and apparently most of them eat it up.
When fukushima was on the news he had a guy who worked on a sub saying a single particle of some nuclear fuel can kill a dog. A single particle! Well they use way more than that at the nuclear plant, so there's a great risk here to kill huge numbers of people OMG! Selling iodine on his site, all his sponsors are companies that sell end-of-worls emergency kits like foot stores, etc. the whole thing is a racket although it's possible he does believe much of it, I don't know.
Last edited:
- Jun 10, 2011
- 291
- 0
- 0
He's saying the elites want to kill and poison Europeans and shit. Yeah sure...................
First off, they are Europeans. Secondly, without a strong middle class their economies would fall way behind China.
First off, they are Europeans. Secondly, without a strong middle class their economies would fall way behind China.
- Jun 10, 2011
- 291
- 0
- 0
Almost all conspiracy theories are plausible. I am open-minded, but that guy is a retard who believes we have some machine that cause earthquakes, kill bird, cause weather disasters and control our minds using microwaves. LOL
- Status
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 20K
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter