- Aug 25, 2001
- 55,097
- 9,145
- 126
Just curious what some people think.
Friend of mine, whom I sold what I thought was a decent 1080P gaming rig, if a bit budget, with a G4560 and 16GB DDR4 and a GTX950 2GB GDDR5 card, a Z170 mobo, a Blu-Ray drive, and a 240GB SSD. I sold him that for $600, including a valid copy of Windows 10. (Payable in 24 monthly installments of $25/mo. He doesn't have a big budget, and I understand.)
I was mostly trying to improve his computing experience, because he's currently using an Athlon II X4 640 3.0Ghz quad-core. The G4560 is 3X ST, and 2X MT performance, according to CPU-Z. Even though it's only a dual-core (with HT).
Now, since the G4560 was released, there have been countless YouTube videos and whatnot reviews made of that little wunder-chip (basically, an i3 for half the price). It was so popular that it spawned shortages, and massive price-gouging on ebay ($100+ for it, when the G4600, the next CPU up the stack, was still under $90).
Anyways, my friend, whom I offered a couple of weeks ago to take the machine back for a full refund, since he has yet to use it, started complaining that it was sub-standard and obsolete.
I'm like, "It's a perfectly valid 1080P gaming platform".
It seems he's never happy. I mean, I feel like I already gave him a "deal", on it, especially with the payment plan, but ... I'm not sure what to do, at this point. He could have gotten a refund, now he's complaining.
Sure, I can build him a $3000 rig, which is what I imagine what a top-end rig would cost these days, but he doesn't have nearly the money for something like that.
It's not like the PC isn't heavily upgradable. It will take Skylake and Kaby Lake CPUs, including the highest unlocked i7 CPUs. i7-7700K is still no slouch. I mean, if he wants that, and a GTX1070ti, fine, he pays for it, and I'll install it. But it seems like he thinks that I'll upgrade it just because he complains it's sub-standard.
Edit: Back to technical issues, the G4560 will scale to a GTX1080, as shown by HardwareUnboxed YT videos of that time, they did some GPU scaling ones. The G4560 is deceptively scalable. Then again, I've seen other videos, that showed that the user had to limit framerate on GTA V to avoid stuttering, to something like 40FPS. Unsure what GPU or what settings they were using. And BF1 64-player online matches were pretty-much out. And WD2 was an issue, but it could play Witcher 3, for suitably smaller values of "play".
Friend of mine, whom I sold what I thought was a decent 1080P gaming rig, if a bit budget, with a G4560 and 16GB DDR4 and a GTX950 2GB GDDR5 card, a Z170 mobo, a Blu-Ray drive, and a 240GB SSD. I sold him that for $600, including a valid copy of Windows 10. (Payable in 24 monthly installments of $25/mo. He doesn't have a big budget, and I understand.)
I was mostly trying to improve his computing experience, because he's currently using an Athlon II X4 640 3.0Ghz quad-core. The G4560 is 3X ST, and 2X MT performance, according to CPU-Z. Even though it's only a dual-core (with HT).
Now, since the G4560 was released, there have been countless YouTube videos and whatnot reviews made of that little wunder-chip (basically, an i3 for half the price). It was so popular that it spawned shortages, and massive price-gouging on ebay ($100+ for it, when the G4600, the next CPU up the stack, was still under $90).
Anyways, my friend, whom I offered a couple of weeks ago to take the machine back for a full refund, since he has yet to use it, started complaining that it was sub-standard and obsolete.
I'm like, "It's a perfectly valid 1080P gaming platform".
It seems he's never happy. I mean, I feel like I already gave him a "deal", on it, especially with the payment plan, but ... I'm not sure what to do, at this point. He could have gotten a refund, now he's complaining.
Sure, I can build him a $3000 rig, which is what I imagine what a top-end rig would cost these days, but he doesn't have nearly the money for something like that.
It's not like the PC isn't heavily upgradable. It will take Skylake and Kaby Lake CPUs, including the highest unlocked i7 CPUs. i7-7700K is still no slouch. I mean, if he wants that, and a GTX1070ti, fine, he pays for it, and I'll install it. But it seems like he thinks that I'll upgrade it just because he complains it's sub-standard.
Edit: Back to technical issues, the G4560 will scale to a GTX1080, as shown by HardwareUnboxed YT videos of that time, they did some GPU scaling ones. The G4560 is deceptively scalable. Then again, I've seen other videos, that showed that the user had to limit framerate on GTA V to avoid stuttering, to something like 40FPS. Unsure what GPU or what settings they were using. And BF1 64-player online matches were pretty-much out. And WD2 was an issue, but it could play Witcher 3, for suitably smaller values of "play".