Is a black light bad for health?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dighn

Lifer
Aug 12, 2001
22,820
4
81
Originally posted by: mdchesne
"premature aging"

wtf?!

Unless you can bend time, you're always gonna be X years old from your birth. no amount of UV will turn you from a XX y/o to a XX+3y/o

UV ages your skin I think
 

Wallydraigle

Banned
Nov 27, 2000
10,754
1
0
Originally posted by: dighn
Originally posted by: mdchesne
"premature aging"

wtf?!

Unless you can bend time, you're always gonna be X years old from your birth. no amount of UV will turn you from a XX y/o to a XX+3y/o

UV ages your skin I think


Your skin is always the same age as the rest of you.
 

dighn

Lifer
Aug 12, 2001
22,820
4
81
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Originally posted by: dighn
Originally posted by: mdchesne
"premature aging"

wtf?!

Unless you can bend time, you're always gonna be X years old from your birth. no amount of UV will turn you from a XX y/o to a XX+3y/o

UV ages your skin I think


Your skin is always the same age as the rest of you.

damn it you nkow what I mean! :p
 

DaiShan

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2001
9,617
1
0
Originally posted by: LordSegan
Actually at least some of them are UV lightbulbs and yes they can in theory give you cancer. It's one thing to use it for a party. I would never use it as a main light source.

Edit: It is UV, but at least one web site I just saw claims its not very harmful. I wouldn't risk it personally.


Ultra Violet refers to the wave length. I think cancer is caused more by higher power than wavelength. However, higher wavelengths tend to be higher power.

/edit IIRC
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
If blacklights were unhealthy there would be about half the number of baby boomers still left alive. :D
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,884
2,124
126
This came up in a college course once- NO. The light is very low intensity. You would need a light like the kind in tanning booths to do any damage.
 

thedrewker

Junior Member
Apr 18, 2017
13
1
41
I'm glad to hear there's no long term threat, but I came to this thread because I was wondering if the black light in my game room/office had something to do with my headache this morning.

I sometimes fall asleep in that room watching movies and I left the black light on last night. Woke up with a pretty severe headache, similar to a bad hangover. Recently put the black light on the desk to add an ambient effect to the lights on the kb+m/case. And my friend gave me the light for free so I wanted to find something to do with it.

Anyway a few other factors may have caused the headache like dehydration, less than optimal sleeping position, etc. I did wake up pretty dehydrated so that's probably it, but I just wanted to check because the light had an unobstructed path to my eyes where I slept, wasn't just ambient.




Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

Carson Dyle

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2012
8,174
524
126
I'm glad to hear there's no long term threat, but I came to this thread because I was wondering if the black light in my game room/office had something to do with my headache this morning.

I sometimes fall asleep in that room watching movies and I left the black light on last night. Woke up with a pretty severe headache, similar to a bad hangover. Recently put the black light on the desk to add an ambient effect to the lights on the kb+m/case. And my friend gave me the light for free so I wanted to find something to do with it.

Anyway a few other factors may have caused the headache like dehydration, less than optimal sleeping position, etc. I did wake up pretty dehydrated so that's probably it, but I just wanted to check because the light had an unobstructed path to my eyes where I slept, wasn't just ambient.

Well, this thread is almost twelve years old. More recent medical research has shown that even relatively short periods of exposure to black light can cause brain cancer that rapidly spreads within hours.

Welcome to ATOT.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
67,335
12,099
126
www.anyf.ca
Could be bad for the eyes if it's within your eye sight. It's UV light. May be bad for skin too, but not sure if a single light bulb is really enough. The purple you see is not UV, the bulb is not 100% UV spectrum and "bleeds" into the visible spectrum too. Any plastics in the area may also degrade faster if it's on for long periods. Though a single bulb is probably relatively harmless I'd say. Think of those bowling alleys where they might be on for hours at a time.

They use high power versions of black lights in hospitals to sanitize rooms. I think it's like 10kw or something like that and full of black light neon tubes. THOSE you don't even want to be in the room when they use it. :p
 
Last edited:

JB24

Member
Mar 22, 2012
75
2
71
Just get 440nm LEDs. The blue lights on my reef tank will fluoresce damn near everything.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
There's lots of confusion in this thread!
The term "black light" typically refers to a fluorescent lamp that appears jet black when off and glows purple when energized. Its emission is in the UVA range close to 400 nanometers. It will NOT cause eye damage. This is commonly called longwave uv by geologists that irradiate minerals with them. The actual term for the lamp type is black light blue.

There is another type of fluorescent tube that appears like your normal fluorescent tube when off and bluish when energized. It still emits longwave UV and will make objects fluoresce quite strongly. This lamp is known as a black light. (strange I know, right) These lamps are commonly used in electric insect lanterns to attract photosensitive insects, luring them to an energized grid where they are instantly destroyed. The original Flowtron (div. of Automatic Radio Corp. in the 70s) used both black light and black light blue tubes for most effective attractant power. It was expensive and later determined that using a pair of inexpensive black light tubes and eventually u-shaped ones - were more cost effective. The dual lamp units also attracted too many non targeted insects (large sphinx moths, Luna moths, etc.) as well.

There are similar lamps that are white when off like the black light tube but are more intense. These are known as actinic lamps and were popular (before LEDs) with reef aquarists and sometimes used to treat jaundice in infants.

Finally, the most dangerous of all the UV emitting lamps is known as the germicidal lamp. Its walls are clear and when energized it appears blue-green. NEVER look at one as this radiation (UV-C, centered at 253.7 nm). The tube is quartz which passes this radiation freely. These are the lamps that are used to disinfect water/air and other medium. Intense lamps will generate ozone from the oxygen in the air. This output is dangerous to skin and eyes. Geologists will use this lamp as well and it will be labeled short wave. The popular "mineralight" of the 70s had twin 4W blacklight blue/germicidal tubes. I used the shortwave tube to erase eprom chips back in the 80s. Today, we have solid state (diode) sources so no more FL lamps, chopper circuits, getting shocked and undesirable EMI/RFI that can interfere with surveillance, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thedrewker

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,562
29,171
146
Finally, the most dangerous of all the UV emitting lamps is known as the germicidal lamp. Its walls are clear and when energized it appears blue-green. NEVER look at one as this radiation (UV-C, centered at 253.7 nm). The tube is quartz which passes this radiation freely. These are the lamps that are used to disinfect water/air and other medium. Intense lamps will generate ozone from the oxygen in the air. This output is dangerous to skin and eyes. Geologists will use this lamp as well and it will be labeled short wave. The popular "mineralight" of the 70s had twin 4W blacklight blue/germicidal tubes. I used the shortwave tube to erase eprom chips back in the 80s. Today, we have solid state (diode) sources so no more FL lamps, chopper circuits, getting shocked and undesirable EMI/RFI that can interfere with surveillance, etc.

In the lab, we use UV lamps at 254/365nm (effective 305 or something?) for exciting EtBr and illuminating nucleic acids in agarose gels. ....it only takes a minute or so with your hand under the shield, if slicing out a gel and with an unnoticed sliver of arm uncovered by gloves or sleeve, to develop a nice, precise burn on that spot. lol....this has happened to me twice. Once, I woke up the next morning with a strange sun burn on my face. Then realized that I probably should have used the face mask instead of the UV glasses to cut out that gel. Yikes.

Not sure if it's the same, but we use the germicidal for regular tissue culture hoods. They are always on when not in use, but I always assume that the glass shield of the hood is a safe barrier, when in the room and looking at the hood with the UV lamp activated?