• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is a 5 foot 5 165 pound chick fat?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
QueBert said:
The men on here know nothing about females of color except they claim every single one of them is ugly as hell. I've dated countless black females, and I'd put money that she's not close to fat. She will be shapely and probably have thick thighs, but both of those are good things.

here's a Ester Baxter who's 5'7 about 150


esther-baxter-smoking-hot.jpg


she an inch taller and weighs 15# less, but there's no fat on her. If she was 165 she'd still not look fat.
Click to expand...

White women =! black women.

Black women generally have half their bodyweight in their ass and tits.
 
QueBert said:
The men on here know nothing about females of color except they claim every single one of them is ugly as hell. I've dated countless black females, and I'd put money that she's not close to fat. She will be shapely and probably have thick thighs, but both of those are good things.

here's a Ester Baxter who's 5'7 about 150


esther-baxter-smoking-hot.jpg


she an inch taller and weighs 15# less, but there's no fat on her. If she was 165 she'd still not look fat.
Click to expand...

Nice proof, a picture that looks like it was done entirely by airbrush.
 
darkswordsman17 said:
Nice proof, a picture that looks like it was done entirely by airbrush.
Click to expand...

lol there's some touch up but not much *sigh*

esther_baxter1.jpg


there's a paparazzi picture of her with zero air brushing, you happy?? One more

50hnnulhjij4hlin.jpg


Any touch up work to the first pic was just normal shit all magazines do. She's not fat and she's close to OP's asking weight.
 
Last edited:
QueBert said:
lol there's some touch up but not much *sigh*

esther-baxter-smoking-hot.jpg


there's a paparazzi picture of her with zero air brushing, you happy?? One more

50hnnulhjij4hlin.jpg


Any touch up work to the first pic was just normal shit all magazines do. She's not fat and she's close to OP's asking weight.
Click to expand...

she is hot as hell.
 
This question again? Yes, fat. It's over 25 lbs heavier than I am, and I'm one inch shorter. Not a lady either.
 
QueBert said:
The men on here know nothing about females of color except they claim every single one of them is ugly as hell. I've dated countless black females, and I'd put money that she's not close to fat. She will be shapely and probably have thick thighs, but both of those are good things.

here's a Ester Baxter who's 5'7 about 150


esther-baxter-smoking-hot.jpg


she an inch taller and weighs 15# less, but there's no fat on her. If she was 165 she'd still not look fat.
Click to expand...
Yeah, she's hot. But I've noticed that most of the "black" women I find attractive are mixed. Most non-mixed girls just don't do anything for me, although there are some beautiful ones out there.

Also, you make it sound like the girl is "only" 15lbs heavier. 15lbs isn't exactly a small difference.
 
QueBert said:
lol there's some touch up but not much *sigh*

there's a paparazzi picture of her with zero air brushing, you happy?? One more

Any touch up work to the first pic was just normal shit all magazines do. She's not fat and she's close to OP's asking weight.
Click to expand...

Normal touch up? Magazines do pretty extensive airbrushing as normal touch up, you know. She's 15 pounds heavier on a 2 inch shorter body. I'm not saying she's disgusting (especially considering we haven't seen a pic of her) but, you're really trying to argue by showing pics of someone who is substantially different?
 
Last edited:
nonameo said:
sts: 4,135

Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueBert View Post
lol there's some touch up but not much *sigh*



there's a paparazzi picture of her with zero air brushing, you happy?? One more



Any touch up work to the first pic was just normal shit all magazines do. She's not fat and she's close to OP's asking weight.
she is hot as hell.
Click to expand...

Let's check back in 20 years. I bet she will be a beast. The thicker they are in their 20's the less you will want them in their 40's. Menopause, gravity, child rearing, and lack of excercise hit women hard by the time they reach their 40's...it is basically inescapable. You have a very low probability of finding a 40 year old woman with a decent figure who was heavy in her teens/20's. Hitting a heavy young chick is completely different from marrying one.
 
QueBert said:
The men on here know nothing about females of color except they claim every single one of them is ugly as hell. I've dated countless black females, and I'd put money that she's not close to fat. She will be shapely and probably have thick thighs, but both of those are good things.

here's a Ester Baxter who's 5'7 about 150


esther-baxter-smoking-hot.jpg


she an inch taller and weighs 15# less, but there's no fat on her. If she was 165 she'd still not look fat.
Click to expand...

lol at bolded

Anyway... she's hot as hell... but cherry-picking 1 in a million women to try to prove a point is just dumb. Her waist-to-hip ratio is retarded (in a seriously good way) and she has a really nice rack. Most women, of any color, do NOT look that good at 150lbs (assuming they're under 5'6"). Once you break 5'6", it's a lot easier for a woman to be sexy at 150 assuming she's active and has some good muscle tone. I dated a PR girl who had very nice hips and a huge latin booty... she was 5'4" and around 135lbs most of our time together and she looked really good. However, at one point she hit just over 150 during school, and it was all in her midsection/thighs... it significantly affected her attractiveness... and yes... 15lbs of fat makes a big difference.

I'll be the first one to stand up when some idiot goes "lol 140lbs she must be a heffer", but let's be realistic. At 5'5", even a "sista" is gonna be hard pressed to look good at 165. She'd have to have serious curves AND be VERY athletic.

What I'm saying is basically, it's possible, but given the average, it's INCREDIBLY UNLIKELY. She'd have to be on the fringe of the bell curve.
 
DVad3r said:
Hey guys, just curious if a 5 foot 5 girl that weighs 165 pounds is fat?
Click to expand...

not if it's Susie Moroney. but it's probably not Susie Moroney.

She's an Australian that swam from Mexico to Cuba (120 miles) and then from Cuba to Florida (90 miles). it was all with boat assist, she swam in a shark cage that was towed by a boat. actually her time was pretty ridiculous, like 5 miles per hour (beyond world record), so she definitely got an assist from the boat.

anyway, those are about her height & weight numbers, at the time of that swim.

DVad3r said:
Are there any pics of similar girls online to view?
Click to expand...

butterball.com

/\ i'd link to it but i don't want to get banned.
 
QueBert said:
lol there's some touch up but not much *sigh*

esther_baxter1.jpg


there's a paparazzi picture of her with zero air brushing, you happy?? One more
Click to expand...

She could slide a Ginsu knife in half with those elbows.

Too pointy.

WTF is she waring? She looks like I dropped stawberry icecream on a brown cat.
 
JulesMaximus said:


My beautiful wife is the one on the right. And that pic was taken only a few months ago...we've been married for 17 years.
Click to expand...

What pic?

That is strange because the pic WAS NOT there when I replied.

Anywyay....no your wife is not fat at all. She is also not 165 lbs.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top