is 5'10" the ideal size for a RB?

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
i can remember back in the 80's with Herschel Walker, Bo Jackson, Eric Dickerson . . . RB's were starting to get tall, i mean of course before that you had tony dorsett, walter payton etc who are about 5'10" i believe. but RB's were getting taller and they were fast.

then in the 90's the premier backs, Emmitt Smith, Barry Sanders, Thurman Thomas and Terrel Davis were all 5'10" or less.

since then most premier RB's seem to be less than 6' tall. were the 80's just an aberation?
 

RKS

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,824
3
81
center of gravity? allowing the runner to make quicker cuts or use quad strength to plow through tacklers.
 

Coquito

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2003
8,559
1
0
Once you get in the open field though, the bigger backs have longer arms to stiff with.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
ya all those things above.

i just found it interesting that over the last 10 seasons or so, most premier backs have been 5'10" 210 to 230 lbs.
 

austin316

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2001
3,572
0
0
Plus, taller running backs don't last as long, since they run more erect and take much bigger shots. One of the most important attributes for a running back these days is to know how to take a blow. Barry Sanders was the best at it. Never missed a game due to injury, because he knew how to take a blow.
 

Coquito

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2003
8,559
1
0
Originally posted by: austin316
Plus, taller running backs don't last as long, since they run more erect and take much bigger shots. One of the most important attributes for a running back these days is to know how to take a blow. Barry Sanders was the best at it. Never missed a game due to injury, because he knew how to take a blow.

For example: Eddie George :(