Is 4006 in 3d Mark 2001 good

[sean2002]

Is this a good score for a 1.33 Tunderbird and a Radeon 64mb SE 230/230 ?

 

[jobberd]

i would say yes, considering a Radeon 32 DDR tops out normally at 2900

 

[AndyHui]

Looks good to me. Are you using default settings?

 

[shOOter9]

thats definatly a nice score for a Radeon....gotta love AMD

 

[Killrose]

I get 3250 with my set up below with 1024x768 32bit, texture comp. enabled.

 

[BadBllock]

Uau!!! 4006????

My Radeon LE 188/196 get 2933, and i'm happy.

Look at me now. I'm a little boy poor.

 

[Toro 45]

I'd be happy with that score, what score do you get with the Radeon at deafault of 200?
Toro

 

[Swanny]

Yeah, that's a good score. Where did you get your Radeon SE? I'm considering putting one in a new system I'm building this summer.

 

[sean2002]

At the default clock I get 3745

 

[SpeedTrap]

haha made a pro do that and came out under 4000. stupid card i think

 

[elkinm]

I have a regular Radeon 32MB DDR on an A7V Duron 700 and I got 2453. (how well do your point sprites work? I got "N/A&quot Honestly I would think that it could do better with 1.33 GHz as I believe I have seen higher GF2 ULTRA scores and since my Radeon beats a GF2 GTS (As far as I have seen), I think the SE should destroy the ULTRA at the same clock speed.

But most importantly, where did you get the SE and for how much? and please post some more performance details (Q3, UT, SS ect.)

 

[elkinm]

One more thing, what resolution and color setings did you run at, I used 1024x768x32.