• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is 256 megs of ram on cheap videocards useless?

winterlude

Senior member
I've noticed that cheap ATI cards like the 9550 and the 9250 with 128 and 64 bit memory controllers had 128megs of ram before but now sell with 256mb.
I haven't been able to find any reviews for these cheap cards to see if there is any real-world difference.

I read on AT that 256 megs without a 256 memory interface isn't much use, but if it's not much more expensive (15-$25), get the 256. I don't subscribe to the idea that more ram is always better. There must be a point when more RAM does next to nothing. So does the extra 128mb of DDR video RAM help those slow cards?

I'd like a real answer please (not just "why not buy a 6200 instead?" etc.)


Thanks in advance
 
Yes
Complete waste on anything below a 9800 PRO.

You only need the ram at high res with eyecandy on. Which is exactly what you won't get with a lowend card
 
What about the 256-bit part of the videocard?

Like a Radeon 9700 Pro... 128mb 256-bit. What is the difference from 128-bit?
 
Originally posted by: RSanders
What about the 256-bit part of the videocard?

Like a Radeon 9700 Pro... 128mb 256-bit. What is the difference from 128-bit?

Yes, that's a high number that matters heh.

I'll go back to my door analogy:

Doors = bit rate
People = RAM

If you try and squeeze 256 people through a wall with 128 doors, there's going to be a decent amount of slowdown no? Not only must they all fit through, but they must fit through their own respective door! (person 1 must go through door 1, etc. On a 128-bit surface, RAM "1" must go through "Bit" 1 (not quite how it works, but it paints a picture). For those with 256 mb RAM and only a 128-bit surface, RAM "1" and RAM "2" must both go through "Bit" 1... providing much slowdown).

On the other hand, if you try 128 people through 256 doors, where person 1 can go through either door 1 or door 2, that provides a significant BOOST.

The optimum is, of course, 256 MB and 256-bit (on high end cards).
 
Originally posted by: RSanders
What about the 256-bit part of the videocard?

Like a Radeon 9700 Pro... 128mb 256-bit. What is the difference from 128-bit?

Double the memory bandwith for the same speed ram.
 
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Originally posted by: RSanders
What about the 256-bit part of the videocard?

Like a Radeon 9700 Pro... 128mb 256-bit. What is the difference from 128-bit?

Yes, that's a high number that matters heh.

I'll go back to my door analogy:

Doors = bit rate
People = RAM

If you try and squeeze 256 people through a wall with 128 doors, there's going to be a decent amount of slowdown no? Not only must they all fit through, but they must fit through their own respective door! (person 1 must go through door 1, etc. On a 128-bit surface, RAM "1" must go through "Bit" 1 (not quite how it works, but it paints a picture). For those with 256 mb RAM and only a 128-bit surface, RAM "1" and RAM "2" must both go through "Bit" 1... providing much slowdown).

On the other hand, if you try 128 people through 256 doors, where person 1 can go through either door 1 or door 2, that provides a significant BOOST.

The optimum is, of course, 256 MB and 256-bit (on high end cards).

I like this analogy 😀
 
Back
Top