• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is $100 extra worth it for flat screen?

S

Spooner

Lifer
i need to replace the tv in the bedroom, so i'm hitting up costco within the next few days to grab a 32" set.

they have one that a toshiba normal boob tube for $299 and a Sharp 32" with flatscreen for $399

i can't decide if flatscreen is worth that extra hundo. I noticed no other difference between tv's (besides brand)
 
Originally posted by: hjo3
If you don't need the space, grab the CRT and save some cash.
Click to expand...

They are both CRT's but the tube isn't flat on the Toshiba one and it is on the Sharp one.

$100 over many many tv hrs is CHEAP. I would definately go with the Sharp one.

Koing
 
i'm leaning toward getting the flat one as $100 isn't all that much

but what am i gaining by it really? does it really make a difference in viewability?
 
It depends. Flat screen CRTs can have severe geometry problems (bowing or uneven picture at the edges)

View them both first with some test patterns.
 
Originally posted by: Spooner
i'm leaning toward getting the flat one as $100 isn't all that much

but what am i gaining by it really? does it really make a difference in viewability?
Click to expand...

yes, less distortion. I find that mild viewing, it doesnt matter. But if you are watching a movie or a sports game, the distortion is very noticeable.
 
Yes, the flat screen makes a big difference.

Both of those seem awfully cheap, are 32" CRT's really that cheap these days? What's a Tau or Wega cost?

If a Tau is outside your budget I would definitely get a flat model, the glare reduction alone is worth it.

Viper GTS
 
ahhh... glare reduction!

i'm sold. there is a ton of glare in my room and anythign that reduces it is an A+ in my opinion
 
Originally posted by: Patt
get the flat one for sure ... much, much better picture with less distortion.
Click to expand...

actually flat screens have more distortion/geometry problems.

But that's a small price to pay for the easier viewing/antiglare.
 
Get a 36. I got a 32 and was upset in less then a year that i did not just go for 36inch. Bought the 36inch later, much happier now.
 
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Get a 36. I got a 32 and was upset in less then a year that i did not just go for 36inch. Bought the 36inch later, much happier now.
Click to expand...

32 is the biggest i can get that'll fit on my dresser in my bedroom 🙁
 
Originally posted by: Spooner
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Get a 36. I got a 32 and was upset in less then a year that i did not just go for 36inch. Bought the 36inch later, much happier now.
Click to expand...

32 is the biggest i can get that'll fit on my dresser in my bedroom 🙁
Click to expand...

Hmm, this sounds like an application for plasma to me.

(is there an echo in here?)
 
I would look for a 30 inch or 34 inch widescreen flat CRT. Better for moving watching.. .. and the proper perspective for HDTV/digital channels.

If you're willing to spend $400, spend a little more and do it right!!
 
The big differences are (1) glare reduction and (2) nice looks. My 27" Panasonic Tau flatscreen doesn't have nearly as much glare as my old bubble-style TVs. That and it looks really cool in my living room. No geometry problems with mine.

Also, if you are looking at other types of tv, there's the quality factor to consider. Ask them to put cable TV on a plasma or LCD...it looks like trash. I shopped around and looked at plasmas, LCDs, projectors, and big rear-projection televisions, and the CRT beat them all for general image quality. I'd say go for the flatscreen CRT.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top