IRS threatens churches non tax status

Uhtrinity

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2003
2,263
202
106
LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- The Internal Revenue Service has warned a prominent liberal church it could lose its tax-exempt status because of an anti-war sermon a guest preacher gave on the eve of the 2004 presidential election, church officials say.


I do agree that churches should stick with religion and stay out of politics or lose their tax-free status, but enforcement needs to be consistant. Where was the IRS last year when a minister booted Kerry supporters out of his church? I'm sure P/N members can point out alot of other examples where nothing was done.

CNN Link
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,333
10,842
136
I wonder if they would be in this situation if it was a "pro-war" sermon...
 

Aegeon

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2004
1,809
125
106
Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
I do agree that churches should stick with religion and stay out of politics or lose their tax-free status, but enforcement needs to be consistant. Where was the IRS last year when a minister booted Kerry supporters out of his church? I'm sure P/N members can point out alot of other examples where nothing was done.
Actually in fairness to the IRS I believe they were investigating the Church where the minister pulled that stunt. Having said that, the details of this case are troubling given the minister did not simply criticize just one of the politicians in his sermon, and concluded by not endorsing one candidate over the other.
 

ntdz

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
6,989
0
0
This doesn't really make sense, I'm sure there were plenty of churches that were pro-Bush that aren't getting threatened.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
There was a story on NPR Monday evening about this case. The preacher apparently said something to the effect that "There are good grounds for supporting either candidate in this [the 2004 Presidential] election. But if Jesus were alive today, he would oppose the war in Iraq."

That gets awfully cose to advocating one candidate over another, and I do agree that religious congregations should not be, in effect, tax-free political advocacy groups. On the other hand, sermonizing on how a prophet would respond to particular contemporary moral issues seems exactly like what religion should be doing.

So my own feeling is that religions shouldn't be tax-exempt at all. That would free them to preach whatever message they wanted - political or otherwise. Under the current system, the "gray area" is just too darn wide.
 

Kibbo86

Senior member
Oct 9, 2005
347
0
0
In what way is a church a business?

A business is run for the profit of an individual.
A corporation is run for the profit of it's shareholders.

Who does a church profit? It's existence is like that of any non-profit organization. It can be corrupt, perhaps, and those in charge of it may (and often do) abuse its position in order to enrich themselves, but it is no different then MADD, or greenpeace.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
I think that all churches should pay taxes since they all are a business.

QFT. That goes for the Indian Casinos as well.

Churches get all this tax-free money and then become tools of politics and they're shocked to learn the IRS might put an end to it?
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,111
926
126
I think that this latest wave of multimillion dollar, lavish facility, evangelical churches, should pay taxes. Anyone ever seen one of those edifices? It becomes readily evident that they are a "for profit" organization. Where do you think most of that money from all their rally's is going? Well, for those who have blind faith, maybe it's time to look at where your pastor lives, as well as what he drives. ;)

A pastor or church, who truely is in the business of doing God's work, civid duty, etc, should be exempt. They probably give more money and clothes to the homeless and their own, making them less on the profit side.

Maybe it's time to categorize churches, then tax or not tax accordingly.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Weren't many of the catholic churches telling their CONgregations not to vote for Kerry because he was Pro-Choice?
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
I don't think politicians should be able to use chuch pulpits while campaigning which IMO is worse than a preacher talking about issues. It's done by both sides and should be a violation. It seems we always had one of the candidates(primaries included) in a church pulpit last election cycle. Sorry, but I don't want politics in my spiritualiy so they should stay out.
 

Bumrush99

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2004
3,334
194
106
Churches are raking in the profits, they keep building huge mega-churches in Wal Mart superstore style.

They should pay taxes, their tax exempt status is BS.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Originally posted by: Bumrush99
Churches are raking in the profits, they keep building huge mega-churches in Wal Mart superstore style.

They should pay taxes, their tax exempt status is BS.

This isn't true either. Many small churches don't get enough money to make ends meet. How many hundred thousand dollar preachers do you think there are?

LOL at the "experts" in church finance.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
This isn't true either. Many small churches don't get enough money to make ends meet. How many hundred thousand dollar preachers do you think there are?

LOL at the "experts" in church finance.

Absolutely. The problem is that those small churches aren't the ones becoming bully pulpits for politics. It is the larger congregrations with the big bucks to throw around. And they ought to be taxed, just like anyone and anything else.

I can think of an example of both "types" of churches right here in my local area. One isn't too far from me and pays their pastor about $28,000 a year. Another is a few miles down the road and pays their "pastor" nearly $120,000 per year. Not coincidentally, one is far more concerned with the people they're supposed to be helping as well.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
This is pretty outrageous. Routinely people like Sen. Frist prepare videos that are shown at churches during services which are blatantly political yet those churches are not threatened with losing their tax exempt status.
 

ShadesOfGrey

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2005
1,523
0
0
Originally posted by: techs
This is pretty outrageous. Routinely people like Sen. Frist prepare videos that are shown at churches during services which are blatantly political yet those churches are not threatened with losing their tax exempt status.

So are you outraged because it was the your "side" that is being investigated instead of Frist? Or are you intellectually honest enough to be outraged at the fact that it's done period?
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,824
2,613
136
By all appearances, this is misuse of the IRS for political attack purposes.

But given the extensive involvement of so-called religious institutions in the political arena today, especially those on the right, I have no objection at all to pulling ALL of their tax exemptions. This loophole is being abused far too much.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: techs
This is pretty outrageous. Routinely people like Sen. Frist prepare videos that are shown at churches during services which are blatantly political yet those churches are not threatened with losing their tax exempt status.

So are you outraged because it was the your "side" that is being investigated instead of Frist? Or are you intellectually honest enough to be outraged at the fact that it's done period?


I am more outraged at the Frist/right wing stuff just because the instance cited in this post is that of a general anti-war sermon which seems pretty much non political and withing the realm of religion versus Frists talks on why we need a certain type of judge that his party supports.