Iraqi exiles gave false information to media...Bush ran into Iraq based on false data

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/nation/8195595.htm

A Knight Ridder review shows there's no evidence to support much of the information that the Iraqi National Congress gave news organizations prior to the Iraq war.

BY JONATHAN S. LANDAY AND TISH WELLS

jlanday@krwashington.com


WASHINGTON - The former Iraqi exile group that gave the Bush administration exaggerated and fabricated intelligence on Iraq also fed much of the same information to newspapers, news agencies and magazines in the United States, Britain and Australia.

A June 26, 2002, letter from the Iraqi National Congress to the Senate Appropriations Committee listed 108 articles based on information provided by the INC's Information Collection Program, a U.S.-funded effort to collect intelligence in Iraq.

The assertions in the articles reinforced President Bush's claims that Saddam Hussein should be ousted because he was in league with Osama bin Laden, was developing nuclear weapons and was hiding biological and chemical weapons.

Feeding the information to the news media, as well as to selected administration officials and members of Congress, helped foster an impression that there were multiple sources of intelligence on Iraq's illicit weapons programs and links to bin Laden.

In fact, many of the allegations came from the same half-dozen defectors, weren't confirmed by other intelligence and were hotly disputed at the CIA, the Defense Department and the State Department.

Nevertheless, U.S. officials and others who supported a preemptive invasion quoted the allegations in statements and interviews without running afoul of restrictions on classified information or doubts about the defectors' reliability.

ASSERTIONS

Other Iraqi groups made similar allegations about Iraq's links to terrorism and hidden weapons that also found their way into official administration statements and into news reports, including several by Knight Ridder.

Knight Ridder, which obtained a copy of the INC letter, reviewed all of the articles in what the document called a ``summary of ICP product cited in major English language news outlets worldwide (October 2001-May 2002).''

The articles made numerous assertions that so far haven't been substantiated 11 months after Baghdad fell, including charges that:

? Hussein collaborated for years with bin Laden and was complicit in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Intelligence officials said there is no evidence of operational ties between Iraq and al Qaeda, and no evidence of an Iraqi hand in the attacks.

? Iraq trained Islamic extremists in the same hijacking techniques used in the Sept. 11 strikes and prepared them for operations against Iraq's neighbors and possibly the United States. Two senior U.S. officials said that so far no evidence has been found to substantiate the charge.

? Iraq had mobile biological warfare facilities disguised as yogurt and milk trucks and hid banned weapons production and storage facilities beneath a hospital, fake lead-lined wells and Hussein's palaces. No such facilities or vehicles have been found.

? Iraq held 80 Kuwaitis captured in the 1991 Gulf War in a secret underground prison in 2000. No Kuwaiti prisoners have been found so far.

? Iraq could launch toxin-armed Scud missiles at Israel that could kill 100,000 people and was aggressively developing nuclear weapons. No Iraqi Scuds have been found.

? Navy Lt. Cmdr. Michael Scott Speicher, missing since the 1991 Gulf war, was seen alive in Baghdad in 1998. The case remains unresolved, but the Navy last week said there was no evidence that Speicher was ever held in captivity.

MEDIA GROUPS

According to the letter, publications in which the articles appeared included The New York Times, The Washington Post, Vanity Fair, The Atlantic Monthly, The Times of London, The Sunday Times of London, The Sunday Age of Melbourne, Australia, and two Knight Ridder newspapers, The Kansas City Star and The Philadelphia Daily News. The Associated Press and others also wrote stories based on INC-provided materials. One of the articles, by Judith Miller of The New York Times, appeared in The Herald on Dec. 21, 2001.

Other U.S. and international news media picked up some of the articles. By mid-January 2002, polls showed that a solid majority of Americans favored military force to oust Hussein. Many of the stories noted that the information they contained couldn't be independently verified.

In at least one case, the INC made a defector available to a journalist before his information had been fully reviewed by U.S. intelligence officials.

DEFECTOR'S CLAIMS

The defector, an engineer, Adnan Ihsan al Haideri, claimed in Miller's New York Times article that there were biological, nuclear and chemical warfare facilities under private villas, the Saddam Hussein Hospital and fake water wells around Baghdad.

Senior U.S. officials said U.S. arms inspectors have found no fake wells or a laboratory under the hospital. Some secret rooms have been located under villas, mosques and palaces, but the officials, who asked not to be identified, said they weren't among locations that al Haideri claimed to know about.

Several requests to The New York Times to speak to Miller were not answered.

INC leader Ahmad Chalabi and other officials have insisted that the group screened all defectors as thoroughly as they could.

U.S. intelligence officials have determined that virtually all of the defectors' information was marginal or useless, and that some of the defectors were fabricators or embellished the threat from Hussein.

Many of the articles relied on interviews with the same defectors, who appeared to change facts. For instance, one defector first appeared in several stories as a former captain in Iraq's army but a later story said he was a major.

Another defector told one interviewer that the aircraft fuselage in which Islamic extremists received training in hijacking belonged to a Boeing 707 and was quoted in a later story as saying that it came from a Russian-made Tupolev.

Intelligence debriefers look for such differences when trying to determine the reliability of defectors, who sometimes exaggerate their importance or try to tell interviewers what they think the interviewers want to hear.

U.S. FINANCED

The Information Collection Program (ICP) was financed out of the more than $18 million that Congress approved for the Iraqi National Congress, led by Chalabi, now a member of the Iraqi Governing Council, between 1999 and 2003. The group remains on the Pentagon's payroll.

The INC letter said that it voluntarily fed ICP information to Arab and Western news media and to two officials in the offices of Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, the leading invasion advocates.

The information bypassed U.S. intelligence channels and reached the recipients even after CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency and FBI officers questioned the accuracy of the materials or the motives of those who supplied them.

Some of the information, such as the charge that Iraq ran a terrorist training camp, found its way into administration statements, including a Sept. 12, 2002, White House paper. The CIA and the State Department had long viewed the INC as unreliable
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
It didn't matter to the Dub,he was looking for any info whether it could be verified or not to invade Iraq.
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
The Iraqi exiles had an agenda, Mr. Bush had an agenda. Their agendas overlapped in many details and prerequisites. It was perfect.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: DoubleL
I am wondering if most the people on here even know why we went to war
In think we all know why but it wasn't the reason we were given by the Dub.
 

maddogchen

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2004
8,903
2
76
Isn't this old news? I remember before the war, news articles about CIA suspicions that they were lying or overstating things. They were labeled as unreliable sources.
 

DoubleL

Golden Member
Apr 3, 2001
1,202
0
0
Because Iraq presented a clear and present danger with their many WMDs!!!!!!!!!!

No that is not why we went to war with Iraq, Just as I thought
 
May 10, 2001
2,669
0
0
Originally posted by: DoubleL
I am wondering if most the people on here even know why we went to war

to kill people, DUH!

Iraqi exiles gave false information to media...Bush ran into Iraq based on false data
good to know he wasn't lying so much as was just misinformed.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
Originally posted by: DoubleL
I am wondering if most the people on here even know why we went to war

to kill people, DUH!

Iraqi exiles gave false information to media...Bush ran into Iraq based on false data
good to know he was truly lying moreso than he was just misinformed as he was using information known to be false or inaccurate.

Edited for accuracy.
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
" I am wondering if most the people on here even know why we went to war"

Because we could - and nobody could stop us, Texas Justice.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
" I am wondering if most the people on here even know why we went to war"

Because we could - and nobody could stop us, Texas Justice.
That's sure how it looks to me.

Little by little, Bush's fabric of deceipt unravels.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: DoubleL
Because Iraq presented a clear and present danger with their many WMDs!!!!!!!!!!

No that is not why we went to war with Iraq, Just as I thought

Please enlighten us.