• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Iraqi death toll approaches 40,000.

tommywishbone

Platinum Member
Iraqi death toll heading to 40,000... no end in sight.Text


Today was a bloody mess.

42 Killed or Found Dead in Iraq Violence By ROBERT H. REID, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 53 minutes ago. May 7, 2006.

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Car bombs killed at least 16 people and injured dozens Sunday in Baghdad and a Shiite holy city, casting doubt on U.S. hopes that formation of a new government alone would provide a quick end to the country's violence.

At least 26 others were killed or found dead Sunday, including a U.S. Marine mortally wounded in the insurgent bastion of Anbar province in western Iraq, police and the U.S. military said.

Some of the victims appeared to have been abducted and killed by sectarian "death squads" that target members of rival religious communities. The dead included three brothers whose charred bodies were found before dawn in Baghdad's Dora district, a mixed Sunni-Shiite area and one of the city's most violent.

The deadliest single attack occurred at midmorning when a suicide driver detonated his vehicle near an Iraqi army patrol leaving its base in the Sunni Arab neighborhood of Azamiyah, killing 10 people and injuring 15, most of them Iraqi soldiers, police Lt. Col. Falah al-Mohammedawi said.

A half-hour earlier, a car bomb exploded near the Baghdad offices of the state-run al-Sabah newspaper, killing an employee, police Lt. Ahmed Mohammed Ali said. Officials believed the target was a police patrol that passed by shortly before the blast.

In Karbala, a Shiite holy city 60 miles south of Baghdad, a suicide car bomber exploded his vehicle near the main provincial government building, killing five people and wounding 19, police spokesman Rahman Mishawi said.

The bomber was unable to reach the government building because of concrete barricades and a police cordon and instead set off his explosives about 300 yards away, police said.

Elsewhere, three policemen were killed in a roadside bombing in the northern city of Mosul, police said. Two bodies with gunshot wounds were found in the center of Mosul late Sunday, police said.

In Baghdad, police and unknown gunmen battled for nearly an hour Sunday in the capital's Saydiyah district. Three policemen were wounded and three gunmen were arrested, police said.

One man was killed and another injured in an explosion Sunday evening at a bombmaking factory in the basement of a Sunni mosque in central Baghdad, the U.S. military said. A bomb exploded in a restaurant late Sunday in Muqdadiyah, 60 miles northeast of Baghdad, injuring dozens, provincial police said.

American troops also fired on a disused train station south of Ramadi, described in a U.S. statement as "a known hub of insurgent activity."

U.S. officials have long contended that violence would subside if Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds believed they had a stake in a new unity government representing all the nation's religious and ethnic communities.

The framework of Iraq's new unity government was put in place last month with the selection of a president, vice presidents, prime minister and parliament speaker. Incoming Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, hopes to present his Cabinet to parliament by Wednesday.

However, a top Shiite official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the deliberations, said al-Maliki would probably not meet that target because of differences among the parties over who will run the ministries of interior and defense.

Those posts control the police and army, and U.S. and British officials have insisted that the new ministers have no ties to militias believed responsible for kidnappings and killings of civilians.

Sectarian violence has forced about 14,700 Iraqi families ? or about 88,000 people ? to flee their homes, a senior Iraqi official said Sunday. The official, Suhaila Abed Jaafar, doubted they could return without "concerted military action" to restore order in their communities.

"The solution is in the hands of the interior and defense ministries," Jaafar, the minister responsible for caring for displaced Iraqis, said.

In London, the British Defense Ministry said "up to five" British personnel had been killed in Saturday's helicopter crash in Basra. British officials have not confirmed Iraqi police and witness reports that the Lynx helicopter was shot down.

Basra, Iraq's second-largest city, was calm Sunday after a day of violence when about 250 Iraqis cheered wildly, hurled stones and fired gunshots at British troops who had rushed to the crash scene. Five Iraqis, including a child, were killed in the melee, and several British troops were slightly injured.

In a bid to ease tension, Basra Gov. Mohammed al-Waeli agreed Sunday to resume cooperation with British authorities, which he broke off four months ago after British troops cracked down on policemen with links to Shiite militias.

Britain's new defense secretary, Des Browne, told Sky News that the unrest in Basra does not mean the security situation has deteriorated there, saying the number of rioters was small in a city of about 1.5 million.

In other developments Sunday:

_Gunmen killed a man headed to work at a wholesale market in southwestern Baghdad.

_A police sergeant was shot dead as he left home in Baghdad's mainly Shiite neighborhood of Kamaliya.

_Bodies of 11 men were found in various parts of the capital, including eight in a garbage container in eastern Baghdad.

_Gunmen killed a cigarette vendor and two policemen in separate shootings in west Baghdad.

? Kurdistan's parliament formally unified the Kurdish region's two long-standing administrations, a step expected to consolidate and strengthen the Kurds' push for power.

------------End story
 
By-golly, things shore iz going good in Eye-Rak...All that there talk about civil war, and bout all the peeple gettin killed is just them-thar lib-ruls tryin to make things look wuss then they reely iz. Heck, ai'n't no red-blooded "merican wanted no dammed flowers throwed at them eny-way. Why I rekon that if it keeps on a goin this way, by this time NEXT yrar, we might have killed 100,000 ot them-thar Eye-Rakees. Thet'll teech em to attack us on 9-11!
 
Given the population of Iraq is about 25 million, I figure if we can kill or get get killed only 24, 960,000 more Iraqis,
it will ours, all ours. But at the paltry rate of only 13,333 per year its going to take 1,875 years to get the job done.

But in this war against terror, our will must never waver. But we must step up the pace. Maybe some WMD's are in order.
We can ask Rumsfeld--after all he was Saddam's go to guy for WMD back when Saddam was our man in the Mid-east.
 
Originally posted by: BoomerD
By-golly, things shore iz going good in Eye-Rak...All that there talk about civil war, and bout all the peeple gettin killed is just them-thar lib-ruls tryin to make things look wuss then they reely iz. Heck, ai'n't no red-blooded "merican wanted no dammed flowers throwed at them eny-way. Why I rekon that if it keeps on a goin this way, by this time NEXT yrar, we might have killed 100,000 ot them-thar Eye-Rakees. Thet'll teech em to attack us on 9-11!

Nice sarcasm. too bad every one of the deaths reported in this story were the results of insurgent attacks.
 
Originally posted by: wetech
Originally posted by: BoomerD
By-golly, things shore iz going good in Eye-Rak...All that there talk about civil war, and bout all the peeple gettin killed is just them-thar lib-ruls tryin to make things look wuss then they reely iz. Heck, ai'n't no red-blooded "merican wanted no dammed flowers throwed at them eny-way. Why I rekon that if it keeps on a goin this way, by this time NEXT yrar, we might have killed 100,000 ot them-thar Eye-Rakees. Thet'll teech em to attack us on 9-11!

Nice sarcasm. too bad every one of the deaths reported in this story were the results of insurgent attacks.


there were no 'insurgents' before saddam was removed from power. unfortunately the administration completely ignored the powell doctrine.

the UN definition for genocide includes the following:

"Genocide as defined by the United Nations in 1948 means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, including:

(c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part"


'the decider' created this war and is fully responsible for it and the consequences of it. the iraqi deathtoll very well may reach 100k before all is said and done.
 
Originally posted by: wetech
Originally posted by: BoomerD
By-golly, things shore iz going good in Eye-Rak...All that there talk about civil war, and bout all the peeple gettin killed is just them-thar lib-ruls tryin to make things look wuss then they reely iz. Heck, ai'n't no red-blooded "merican wanted no dammed flowers throwed at them eny-way. Why I rekon that if it keeps on a goin this way, by this time NEXT yrar, we might have killed 100,000 ot them-thar Eye-Rakees. Thet'll teech em to attack us on 9-11!

Nice sarcasm. too bad every one of the deaths reported in this story were the results of insurgent attacks.


Your point is?

Where did the insurgents come from? Do you REALLY believe they are all from other countries, or...just think a minute...COULD they be Iraqi's who want us out of their country? What happened to the Iraqi army that disappeared when we invaded? Remember? They just laid down their arms and vanished? Remember the fabled Republican Guard? They just vanished into thin air as well...Amazing how these "insurgents" happen to be so well schooled in warfare, including demolition and explosives...Do you think that maybe SOME of them happen to be those Iraqi soldiers that disappeared?

Regardless of who killed who in the story, if we hadn't invaded the WRONG country, this would not be happening...
 
Originally posted by: wetech
Originally posted by: BoomerD
By-golly, things shore iz going good in Eye-Rak...All that there talk about civil war, and bout all the peeple gettin killed is just them-thar lib-ruls tryin to make things look wuss then they reely iz. Heck, ai'n't no red-blooded "merican wanted no dammed flowers throwed at them eny-way. Why I rekon that if it keeps on a goin this way, by this time NEXT yrar, we might have killed 100,000 ot them-thar Eye-Rakees. Thet'll teech em to attack us on 9-11!

Nice sarcasm. too bad every one of the deaths reported in this story were the results of insurgent attacks.

Agreed, since when did Islamic militants needed any excuses to stir up sectarian civil wars. The U.S. is just a scrapegoat for this war. Shia-Sunni have always fought bloody wars, this war is just another one.
 
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: wetech
Originally posted by: BoomerD
By-golly, things shore iz going good in Eye-Rak...All that there talk about civil war, and bout all the peeple gettin killed is just them-thar lib-ruls tryin to make things look wuss then they reely iz. Heck, ai'n't no red-blooded "merican wanted no dammed flowers throwed at them eny-way. Why I rekon that if it keeps on a goin this way, by this time NEXT yrar, we might have killed 100,000 ot them-thar Eye-Rakees. Thet'll teech em to attack us on 9-11!

Nice sarcasm. too bad every one of the deaths reported in this story were the results of insurgent attacks.


Your point is?

Where did the insurgents come from? Do you REALLY believe they are all from other countries, or...just think a minute...COULD they be Iraqi's who want us out of their country? What happened to the Iraqi army that disappeared when we invaded? Remember? They just laid down their arms and vanished? Remember the fabled Republican Guard? They just vanished into thin air as well...Amazing how these "insurgents" happen to be so well schooled in warfare, including demolition and explosives...Do you think that maybe SOME of them happen to be those Iraqi soldiers that disappeared?

Regardless of who killed who in the story, if we hadn't invaded the WRONG country, this would not be happening...

My point is you were saying that WE would have killed 100,000 and yet it wasn't US doing the killing here. And do you think that we'd still be there if people like this would just get their act together and stop blowing each other up? How does blowing yourself up in the middle of a crowd convince us that it's ok for us to leave. The way for these terrorists (and yes they are terrorists, I'm not putting that in quotes. If you're a bomber intent on killing innocent civilians, you're a terrorist) to convince us to leave is to stop killing people. Once the situation is finally stabilized, the US will pull out.
 
Originally posted by: Braznor
Agreed, since when did Islamic militants needed any excuses to stir up sectarian civil wars. The U.S. is just a scrapegoat for this war. Shia-Sunni have always fought bloody wars, this war is just another one.

Last I recall, Saddam kept law and order in most of Iraq.
 
Originally posted by: wetech
Originally posted by: BoomerD
By-golly, things shore iz going good in Eye-Rak...All that there talk about civil war, and bout all the peeple gettin killed is just them-thar lib-ruls tryin to make things look wuss then they reely iz. Heck, ai'n't no red-blooded "merican wanted no dammed flowers throwed at them eny-way. Why I rekon that if it keeps on a goin this way, by this time NEXT yrar, we might have killed 100,000 ot them-thar Eye-Rakees. Thet'll teech em to attack us on 9-11!

Nice sarcasm. too bad every one of the deaths reported in this story were the results of insurgent attacks.

And then....
 
Originally posted by: wetech
Originally posted by: BoomerD
By-golly, things shore iz going good in Eye-Rak...All that there talk about civil war, and bout all the peeple gettin killed is just them-thar lib-ruls tryin to make things look wuss then they reely iz. Heck, ai'n't no red-blooded "merican wanted no dammed flowers throwed at them eny-way. Why I rekon that if it keeps on a goin this way, by this time NEXT yrar, we might have killed 100,000 ot them-thar Eye-Rakees. Thet'll teech em to attack us on 9-11!

Nice sarcasm. too bad every one of the deaths reported in this story were the results of insurgent attacks.

It's the invading force's responsibilty to secure invaded territory, they're the only law body after invasion. We did it in Germany and Japan in WW2, we haven't done it here. Maybe you ask why?
 
Originally posted by: Braznor
Originally posted by: wetech
Originally posted by: BoomerD
By-golly, things shore iz going good in Eye-Rak...All that there talk about civil war, and bout all the peeple gettin killed is just them-thar lib-ruls tryin to make things look wuss then they reely iz. Heck, ai'n't no red-blooded "merican wanted no dammed flowers throwed at them eny-way. Why I rekon that if it keeps on a goin this way, by this time NEXT yrar, we might have killed 100,000 ot them-thar Eye-Rakees. Thet'll teech em to attack us on 9-11!

Nice sarcasm. too bad every one of the deaths reported in this story were the results of insurgent attacks.

Agreed, since when did Islamic militants needed any excuses to stir up sectarian civil wars. The U.S. is just a scrapegoat for this war. Shia-Sunni have always fought bloody wars, this war is just another one.

The "Real Politik" problem is that the US removed the ONE thing holding them apart and maintaining some semblance of stability - a strongman dictator named Saddam. Now, he was a terrible, terrible man...killed many of his own people, stood on a soapbox and threatened Isreal, paid off Palestinian families that sourced suicide bombers...etc. He also fought a pretty bloody war against Iran that killed well over a million in total.

But at least their was electric power and running water in Iraq when he ruled...at least the streets were safe for day to day commerce. At least school was conducted. At least there was healthcare. Now none of that exists with any regularity. For your average Iraqi, the 'normalicy' of life under Saddam was a hell of a lot better than it has been over the past 3 years. And WE DID IT TO THEM.

We took Humpty Dumpty apart - and we have no real timetable for putting him back together. Only some of this is about actual religion - a lot of this is about control of the oil fields by each ethnicity. And THAT I fear is going to be an intractible problem...how to allocate the oil wealth to each ethnicity. Only a very strong, stable, and transparent (read: free of corruption) central government can do that - and Iraq is a LONG way from such. And so, a never-ending civil war looms as a real possibility...

Future Shock
 
Originally posted by: wetech

Nice sarcasm. too bad every one of the deaths reported in this story were the results of insurgent attacks.


Wrong. Only some of the deaths are from insurgents. The others are from Shi'ite death squads.

The corpses show up in the streets, handcuffed, with entry wounds in the back of the head - these are the calling cards of the fundamentalist Shia death squads. They executed 1500 Sunnis this past February - this is just a continuing of their work.

For your own future reference: bombings - insurgents, attacks on recruiting stations/police stations - insurgents, attacks on US personnel/convoys - insurgents, attacks on oil distribution network/ utilities - insurgents, gangland style executions/dumped bodies - Shia death squads, attacks on TV stations/newspapers - death squads, attacks on university professors - death squads, attacks in the southern and eastern provinces (Basra) - radical Shi'ite militia, attacks on Shia holy sites - insurgents.

 
🙁 Madness, courtesy of the USA (No, this is not the same report as yesterday).

Violence in Iraq Leaves at Least 34 Dead By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writer
Mon May 8, 11:21 PM ET

including a U.S. soldierBAGHDAD, Iraq - Violence killed at least 34 people as efforts to finish choosing the new Cabinet bogged down Monday in a web of conflicting interests.

The deadliest attack Monday occurred when a car bomb exploded near an Iraqi court in central Baghdad, killing five Iraqi civilians and wounding 10, police Lt. Col. Falah al-Mohammedawi said.

Two Iraqi policemen died and 12 people were wounded when another car bomb went off near a police patrol traveling down busy Palestine Street in eastern Baghdad, police Lt. Ahmed Qassim said.

The American soldier was killed when a roadside bomb[/U] struck a military convoy Monday southeast of Baghdad, according to a U.S. statement. The command did not specify the location, but Iraqi police reported a bombing damaged a U.S. convoy between the Shiite holy cities of Karbala and Najaf.

In a separate statement, the U.S. command said one American soldier was killed and another wounded during a clash Sunday near Tal Afar, 260 miles northwest of Baghdad.

The fatalities raised to at least 2,421 the number of U.S. military members who have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.

At least 33 American troops have been killed since April 22, when the new Iraqi government began to take shape with the selection of top leaders and the appointment of Nouri al-Maliki as prime minister-designate.

Al-Maliki, a Shiite, had hoped to complete the selection of his Cabinet on Tuesday or Wednesday. That would mark the final step in the establishment of the new government of national unity, which U.S. officials hope can calm sectarian tensions, lure Sunni Arabs from the insurgency and enable American troops to go home.

However, key Shiite and Sunni lawmakers told The Associated Press Monday that it was unlikely al-Maliki would finish the task this week because of the need to balance the interests of the religiously and ethnically based parties.

Late Monday, Shiite lawmaker Bahaa al-Din al-Araji told the AP that the parties had agreed broadly on what factions would get specific posts. But they have yet to decide on the candidates to assume those positions.

Speaking about the prospects for Iraqi national unity, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Monday that the U.S. government is not looking "at how hard they're working to hang together, because they literally will hang separately or hang together, literally. There's no stronger incentive to get it right than the incentives that they have."

The main stumbling block is the choice to head the Interior Ministry, which controls the police, and the Defense Ministry, which runs the army. U.S. and British officials have insisted those posts go to people without ties to sectarian militias, responsible for many of the tit-for-tat killings of Sunnis and Shiites.

Several lawmakers said the Shiite alliance and the Sunni bloc were searching for candidates with enough independence to satisfy the Americans and the British, but who would also be acceptable to the Iraqi parties.

One lawmaker said outgoing Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Chalabi, a former Pentagon favorite, had been mentioned to head the Interior Ministry. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the talks are secret, acknowledged that Chalabi was a long shot.

Chalabi, a secular Shiite, had once been Washington's choice to replace Saddam Hussein, but he fell from favor after the U.S.-led invasion and failed to win a parliament seat in the Dec. 15 election.

But Chalabi has proven one of the most resilient figures in Iraqi politics and has forged ties not only with radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr but with some Sunni groups as well.

Sunni Arabs have been pushing hard for one of the seven top ministries, which include interior and defense. Sunnis hold only 55 of the 275 parliament seats, compared with 130 for the Shiites.

"In reality, the situation is being dictated by the Americans on the basis of electoral results, not the national interest," Sunni politician Khalaf al-Ilyan said. "The distribution (of posts) is based on sects, Sunni, Kurdish, Shiite."

As the politicians haggled, bloodshed continued.

Two employees of an Iraqi television station were found dead Monday, a day after they were stopped by men wearing police uniforms on a road southwest of Baghdad, according to Abdul-Karim al-Mehdawi, general manager of Al-Nahrain TV. The bodies of journalist Laith al-Dulaimi and telephone operator Muazaz Ahmed were taken to a morgue in Kut.

At least 69 journalists have been killed in Iraq since the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003, according to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists. About three-fourths of them were Iraqis.

At least 19 other bodies were found Monday, including 12 in Baghdad and seven in Kut, according to police. They appeared to have been victims of sectarian death squads.

In other violence Monday:

? Gunmen stopped a bus carrying Higher Education Ministry employees to work in western Baghdad, killing the driver and wounding a guard, police Capt. Jamil Hussein said.

? Two gunmen were killed in a clash with Iraqi soldiers in Baghdad's Dora neighborhood.

? One person was killed and another wounded in a drive-by shooting in a west Baghdad market.

? A pharmacist was killed in Mosul by gunmen who set fire to his drug store.

End story--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 
Originally posted by: RMich
Approaches 40,000? I thought we passed 40,000 a long, long time ago.

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6596

The count of 40,000 is just deaths reported by the media, I believe, and therefore is almost certainly a serious underestimate.
Yes. The Iraq Body Count methodology is extremely conservative. Actual deaths may be approaching, or have even exceeded 100,000.

rose.gif
 
I do not remember who said it (one of the Taliban or the like), but the statement was "you Americans will never win the war in Iraq because you don't have the stomach to do what needs to be done" (to win). War is not nice or pretty. War is not democratic. War is not a contest between the pure of heart and the evil doers. War is ugly and nasty. We subdued towns in Germany in WWII through the following methods: 1. Summarily shot anyone who resisted (the British used the guillotine), shelled towns to rubble that showed any signs of resistance, interned in POW camps all enemy combatants and of course the Nuremburg Trials. Few in this country questioned the methods, because most were behind the war and FDR. Before WWII, many americans were against getting involved in the "European war", but when we were attacked, Americans rallied and fought to the death, using any method to win. Sadly, this is not the case today, and in the long run, many more will die because of it.
 
Originally posted by: runzwithsizorz
I do not remember who said it (one of the Taliban or the like), but the statement was "you Americans will never win the war in Iraq because you don't have the stomach to do what needs to be done" (to win). War is not nice or pretty. War is not democratic. War is not a contest between the pure of heart and the evil doers. War is ugly and nasty. We subdued towns in Germany in WWII through the following methods: 1. Summarily shot anyone who resisted (the British used the guillotine), shelled towns to rubble that showed any signs of resistance, interned in POW camps all enemy combatants and of course the Nuremburg Trials. Few in this country questioned the methods, because most were behind the war and FDR. Before WWII, many americans were against getting involved in the "European war", but when we were attacked, Americans rallied and fought to the death, using any method to win. Sadly, this is not the case today, and in the long run, many more will die because of it.

Wow, a post that totally misses the difference between a political war lead by a government and a religious or ideological war lead by zealots.

You can end a political war by removing the political leadership - we DID that in WWII to end it. Kill the head Nazis and Fascists, and the country surrenders totally.

It's nearly impossible to do that in a war of ideologies...you kill the current leaders, and more simply spring up underground. The Israelis have the best experience with this - they killed or arrested EVERY Hamas leader they could find and execute - and yet years later Hamas has emerged as the leading political power in the occupied lands. For that matter, go ask the English Army about fighting the IRA...same problem. (Indidentally, the strong ideology of the Japanse was precisely why we DID use the atomic bomb on them, because it was believe that they simply wouldn't surrender even if we killed their political leadership - and that's the SAME war you said we fought so well...)

You talk about shooting everyone that resists. We DO that...the problem is that 9AM to 5PM most of the death squads don't look like death squads...they are members of the police, the military, shopkeepers, bakers, fathers, etc. They only come out and show themselves when they are planting bombs or conducting hits - and THAT is the only time we can identify them. And we DO kill them on sight.

The age-old solution to this is to go into an occupied land and kill every male that could fight, or given the current predaliction for female bombers, every male and female of fighting age. So you would need, in your well-fought war, to kill everyone between 12 and 65 at least. You are right, we probably don't have the stomach to do that, so let's go home...

Future Shock

 
Update: Mission Accomplished!

Gunmen Kill Son of Top Iraqi Judge By SINAN SALAHEDDIN, Associated Press Writer
2 hours, 3 minutes ago, May 13, 2006.

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Gunmen killed the son of Iraq's top judge Saturday as the country's prime minister-designate struggled to form a national unity government that could eventually open the way to stability.

Attacks outside Baghdad killed five Iraqis and a U.S. soldier, part of the undercurrent of daily violence marring the slow-moving political process.

Frustrated with such violence in the south, the governor of oil-rich Basra, Mohammed al-Waeli, asked his provincial council to fire the regional police chief and the defense ministry to sack an Iraqi army general.

Al-Waeli, a member of the dominant Shiite coalition, demanded the dismissal of police Maj. Gen. Hassan Swadi and army Maj. Gen. Abdullatif Taaban for failing to rein in violence that has marred his region in recent days.

In one success, Kurdish security forces in the north said they arrested five men who had escaped on May 9 from the U.S. military Fort Suse Theater internment facility near Sulaimaniyah, 160 miles northeast of Baghdad.

With a May 22 constitutional deadline to form the new Cabinet rapidly approaching, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki urged a breakaway party to return to the ranks of the Shiite coalition that dominates the 275-member parliament, and again join negotiations to form his government.

Parliament, which must approve the makeup of the government, was to convene Sunday, and some lawmakers have suggested that al-Maliki could present some of his Cabinet. In an effort to get around an impasse on key ministries ? including defense and interior ? al-Maliki could appoint himself to temporarily run those ministries.

Wrangling over the makeup of a government that will be representative of all religious groups and political trends has delayed for months the formation of a new government following the successful Dec. 15 legislative elections, which saw a record turnout among Sunni Arabs that form the heart of the insurgency.

The Shiite Fadhila party withdrew from negotiations and removed the support of its 15 deputies for the 130-strong United Iraqi Alliance last Friday after complaining, in part, over al-Maliki's failure to give it the country's top oil post. The party held the oil and tourism portfolios under outgoing Shiite Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari.

The party has threatened to set up an opposition bloc in parliament.

Al-Maliki said in a statement that he was "keen on the participation of the Fadhila party in the formation of the government and its participation in the United Iraqi Alliance."

He added that "Fadhila is part of the Alliance. If there is a dispute over ministerial posts, it can be resolved through dialogue."

Fadhila spokesman Sheik Sabah al-Saedi said earlier that the party's 15 legislators in the 275-member parliament would go ahead and form an opposition bloc. He denied the oil portfolio was behind the decision to withdraw.

"The main reason behind our withdrawal from the new government is that we do believe that Iraq needs a strong and competent government that is able to consider the national interests rather than narrow ones," al-Saedi told AP Television News.

On Saturday, police found the bodies of Ahmed Midhat al-Mahmoud, 22, a lawyer, and two of his bodyguards in northern Baghdad's Azamiyah district, said Hasan Sabri the head of the local council and Iraq's deputy justice minister, Busho Ibrahim Ali.

The killings came five months after the judge, Midhat al-Mahmoud, survived a Dec. 4 suicide bomb attack against his home. Two people were wounded in the attack.

Ahmed Midhat al-Mahmoud's father heads the Supreme Judicial Council, a judicial supervisory body which among other things swears in all judges and parliament.

The al-Mahmoud family is Shiite and the three bodies were found dumped onto a street in the mostly Sunni Arab neighborhood of Azamiyah, Sabri and Ali said.

The killings were the latest carried out against government officials or their families. They could also be part of a series of killings carried out by death squads and militias, who have kidnapped and killed hundreds of Sunnis and Shiites ? often motivated by sectarian hatred.

Elsewhere, a U.S. soldier was killed by a roadside bomb at about 4 a.m., south of Baghdad, the military said. The attack raised to at least 2,437 the number of members of the U.S. military who have died since the Iraq war started in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.

Five Iraqis also were killed in drive-by shootings Saturday, including a tribal sheik, officials said.

End story---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Back
Top