Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Are we really going to hold them to different standards than we hold ourselves?
Originally posted by: MC
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Are we really going to hold them to different standards than we hold ourselves?
No, but doesn't Iraqi people should decide for themselves?
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: MC
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Are we really going to hold them to different standards than we hold ourselves?
No, but doesn't Iraqi people should decide for themselves?
No. Why would we do that? They have Allah. We have God. We have proven God is stronger than Allah. We should decide. But why on earth would we make them a democracy if we (the United States of America) cannot be a democracy?
Originally posted by: Thera
He also said he wanted church and state to be seperated in the new Irak. Interesting that he doesn't believe in that at home.
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: MC
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Are we really going to hold them to different standards than we hold ourselves?
No, but doesn't Iraqi people should decide for themselves?
No. Why would we do that? They have Allah. We have God. We have proven God is stronger than Allah. We should decide. But why on earth would we make them a democracy if we (the United States of America) cannot be a democracy?
How exactly are we not a democracy? A democracy is a government ruled by the people either directly or through elected representatives, or in broader terms, a rule by the majority opinion. The US fits that description. But even if we don't fit that perfectly, we are still a hell of a lot more of a democracy than Iraq was. And, just call me crazy here, but if the Iraqi people are allowed to choose their form of government, isn't that democratic rule? And, again, call me crazy, but if given the choice, how many of them do you think will choose dictatorship over democracy? To put it another way, would you feel comfortable going to Iraq and telling the people in some village there, "Sorry, the US is evil so it wouldn't be right to support a democratic government in your country. We're just going to leave you at the mercy of whichever faction is the strongest. We don't want to interfere with your rights."
For those of you that don't think the US can set up a democracy, look at Japan. I'll admit we don't have the best track record, but Japan didn't turn out too bad, and we essentially wrote their constitution for them and created their new government after WWII. Iraq has a good base for a thriving economy from their oil, and if control of the country can be given to the people, they could do pretty well.
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Thera
He also said he wanted church and state to be seperated in the new Irak. Interesting that he doesn't believe in that at home.
Yep, I'm being forced to go to a Christian Church and pray to God. I have no religious rights and Bush is forcing everyone to be Christian. Oh, wait, no he's not! Just because Bush is religious doesn't mean he's taking away seperation of church and state.
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: MC
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Are we really going to hold them to different standards than we hold ourselves?
No, but doesn't Iraqi people should decide for themselves?
No. Why would we do that? They have Allah. We have God. We have proven God is stronger than Allah. We should decide. But why on earth would we make them a democracy if we (the United States of America) cannot be a democracy?
How exactly are we not a democracy? A democracy is a government ruled by the people either directly or through elected representatives, or in broader terms, a rule by the majority opinion. The US fits that description. But even if we don't fit that perfectly, we are still a hell of a lot more of a democracy than Iraq was. And, just call me crazy here, but if the Iraqi people are allowed to choose their form of government, isn't that democratic rule? And, again, call me crazy, but if given the choice, how many of them do you think will choose dictatorship over democracy? To put it another way, would you feel comfortable going to Iraq and telling the people in some village there, "Sorry, the US is evil so it wouldn't be right to support a democratic government in your country. We're just going to leave you at the mercy of whichever faction is the strongest. We don't want to interfere with your rights."
For those of you that don't think the US can set up a democracy, look at Japan. I'll admit we don't have the best track record, but Japan didn't turn out too bad, and we essentially wrote their constitution for them and created their new government after WWII. Iraq has a good base for a thriving economy from their oil, and if control of the country can be given to the people, they could do pretty well.
I believe it was always common thought that the US is a republic.
Originally posted by: Thera
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Thera
He also said he wanted church and state to be seperated in the new Irak. Interesting that he doesn't believe in that at home.
Yep, I'm being forced to go to a Christian Church and pray to God. I have no religious rights and Bush is forcing everyone to be Christian. Oh, wait, no he's not! Just because Bush is religious doesn't mean he's taking away seperation of church and state.
Sure thing... I wonder how many Islamic groups will get our tax dollars?
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Thera
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Thera
He also said he wanted church and state to be seperated in the new Irak. Interesting that he doesn't believe in that at home.
Yep, I'm being forced to go to a Christian Church and pray to God. I have no religious rights and Bush is forcing everyone to be Christian. Oh, wait, no he's not! Just because Bush is religious doesn't mean he's taking away seperation of church and state.
Sure thing... I wonder how many Islamic groups will get our tax dollars?
Speculation is not grounds for getting all pissed off about something. The page says nothing about funding only Christian groups, simply "faith based". The link you gave does nothing to disprove what I said. Freedom of religion is stronger in the US than it ever was. Don't believe me? Look at the beating the Boy Scouts are taking with public funding over their Christian only clause. This country used to be one big happy Christian family (regardless of what the constitution said), and now it's finally becoming what it was supposed to be in the first place. I personally think you have it backwards.
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: MC
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Are we really going to hold them to different standards than we hold ourselves?
No, but doesn't Iraqi people should decide for themselves?
No. Why would we do that? They have Allah. We have God. We have proven God is stronger than Allah. We should decide. But why on earth would we make them a democracy if we (the United States of America) cannot be a democracy?
How exactly are we not a democracy? A democracy is a government ruled by the people either directly or through elected representatives, or in broader terms, a rule by the majority opinion. The US fits that description. But even if we don't fit that perfectly, we are still a hell of a lot more of a democracy than Iraq was. And, just call me crazy here, but if the Iraqi people are allowed to choose their form of government, isn't that democratic rule? And, again, call me crazy, but if given the choice, how many of them do you think will choose dictatorship over democracy? To put it another way, would you feel comfortable going to Iraq and telling the people in some village there, "Sorry, the US is evil so it wouldn't be right to support a democratic government in your country. We're just going to leave you at the mercy of whichever faction is the strongest. We don't want to interfere with your rights."
For those of you that don't think the US can set up a democracy, look at Japan. I'll admit we don't have the best track record, but Japan didn't turn out too bad, and we essentially wrote their constitution for them and created their new government after WWII. Iraq has a good base for a thriving economy from their oil, and if control of the country can be given to the people, they could do pretty well.
I believe it was always common thought that the US is a republic.
Semantics IMHO, but you're splitting hairs in any case. Fine, we'll help the Iraqis set up a republic, that doesn't change my point that I'm sure they would want something along those lines a hell of a lot more than they would want another dictator.
Originally posted by: Alistar7
The Kurds seem to like it very well. Where are the calls for an Islamic state coming from anyway? Iranian clerics. Remember the huge pilgirmage Saddam basically outlawed, the most important to their religion? Notice the Iranian clerics tried to organize a HUGE anti US/ pro Islamic state rally right afterwards, why not, there were MILLIONS of the most die hard believers there. Less than 3,000 attended the "rally", Pro US rallies and sentiments dwarfed them that day, seems many were gratefull for our action which had allowed them to practice their religion again freely. The LOCAL clerics have called for their religion to be kept separate from the govt, wisely so. They understand what happens when one group or idea has control over anything else, they have lived their entire lives under such tyranny. Many ofthe exiles agree a 3-6 member presidential "coucil" should be used rather than ONE person, does that sound like the US?
Anything better to do than bash the US?
Any comments on the admissions of hidden WMD programs? The links to Al-Queeda being found? Or do you not plan on addressing the facts that make the US credible?
There are differences over the role of the Americans. We here prefer the Americans to rule us in the interim period," said Suheil al-Suheil, a Baghdad lawyer. "We are not ready to handle this yet. Saddam's orphans are still alive."
Well they already tried Republican "Guard" so it's good to let them go with Democrats this time around."Iraq will be democratic!"
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: MC
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Are we really going to hold them to different standards than we hold ourselves?
No, but doesn't Iraqi people should decide for themselves?
No. Why would we do that? They have Allah. We have God. We have proven God is stronger than Allah. We should decide. But why on earth would we make them a democracy if we (the United States of America) cannot be a democracy?
How exactly are we not a democracy? A democracy is a government ruled by the people either directly or through elected representatives, or in broader terms, a rule by the majority opinion. The US fits that description. But even if we don't fit that perfectly, we are still a hell of a lot more of a democracy than Iraq was. And, just call me crazy here, but if the Iraqi people are allowed to choose their form of government, isn't that democratic rule? And, again, call me crazy, but if given the choice, how many of them do you think will choose dictatorship over democracy? To put it another way, would you feel comfortable going to Iraq and telling the people in some village there, "Sorry, the US is evil so it wouldn't be right to support a democratic government in your country. We're just going to leave you at the mercy of whichever faction is the strongest. We don't want to interfere with your rights."
For those of you that don't think the US can set up a democracy, look at Japan. I'll admit we don't have the best track record, but Japan didn't turn out too bad, and we essentially wrote their constitution for them and created their new government after WWII. Iraq has a good base for a thriving economy from their oil, and if control of the country can be given to the people, they could do pretty well.
I believe it was always common thought that the US is a republic.
Semantics IMHO, but you're splitting hairs in any case. Fine, we'll help the Iraqis set up a republic, that doesn't change my point that I'm sure they would want something along those lines a hell of a lot more than they would want another dictator.
You're right. Its semantics. Something law basically revolves around. But I did learn something. I looked up democracy (dictionary.com rocks ), and saw the definition you had written. So democracy works in this case, unless you are a lawyer. Sorry about the confusion.
Originally posted by: Thera
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Thera
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Thera
He also said he wanted church and state to be seperated in the new Irak. Interesting that he doesn't believe in that at home.
Yep, I'm being forced to go to a Christian Church and pray to God. I have no religious rights and Bush is forcing everyone to be Christian. Oh, wait, no he's not! Just because Bush is religious doesn't mean he's taking away seperation of church and state.
Sure thing... I wonder how many Islamic groups will get our tax dollars?
Speculation is not grounds for getting all pissed off about something. The page says nothing about funding only Christian groups, simply "faith based". The link you gave does nothing to disprove what I said. Freedom of religion is stronger in the US than it ever was. Don't believe me? Look at the beating the Boy Scouts are taking with public funding over their Christian only clause. This country used to be one big happy Christian family (regardless of what the constitution said), and now it's finally becoming what it was supposed to be in the first place. I personally think you have it backwards.
I was talking about separation of Church and State, not freedom of religion.
Originally posted by: LilBlinbBlahIce
Originally posted by: Alistar7
The Kurds seem to like it very well. Where are the calls for an Islamic state coming from anyway? Iranian clerics. Remember the huge pilgirmage Saddam basically outlawed, the most important to their religion? Notice the Iranian clerics tried to organize a HUGE anti US/ pro Islamic state rally right afterwards, why not, there were MILLIONS of the most die hard believers there. Less than 3,000 attended the "rally", Pro US rallies and sentiments dwarfed them that day, seems many were gratefull for our action which had allowed them to practice their religion again freely. The LOCAL clerics have called for their religion to be kept separate from the govt, wisely so. They understand what happens when one group or idea has control over anything else, they have lived their entire lives under such tyranny. Many ofthe exiles agree a 3-6 member presidential "coucil" should be used rather than ONE person, does that sound like the US?
Anything better to do than bash the US?
Any comments on the admissions of hidden WMD programs? The links to Al-Queeda being found? Or do you not plan on addressing the facts that make the US credible?
There are differences over the role of the Americans. We here prefer the Americans to rule us in the interim period," said Suheil al-Suheil, a Baghdad lawyer. "We are not ready to handle this yet. Saddam's orphans are still alive."
Ok, I will agree with you that the anti-American demostrations are busts, but where are all these huge pro-America rallies you keep talking about? It seems to me that if they are not protesting the US, they are just staying home and tying to normalize thier lives. I just want to see some credible links validating the huge pro-US rally claims.
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: LilBlinbBlahIce
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Q]
I did not say HUGE, I just said PRO, there were some, a few thousand each at any of them, but still more in number than the protests by far. They were also expressing their graitude to the US during the pilgrimage in various ways, both vocally and physically, carrying sign, flags, making gestures, etc.. I looked all over AJ and the BBC, couldn't find anything on those, do have some American media links but those are all biased anyway, lol.
No, as long as they are not FOX news, any links will do.
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Why? The same facts coming from Fox are somehow different? Has anyone been able to find one story or fact about this war NOT covered truthfully by Fox? j/c
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: MC
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Are we really going to hold them to different standards than we hold ourselves?
No, but doesn't Iraqi people should decide for themselves?
No. Why would we do that? They have Allah. We have God. We have proven God is stronger than Allah. We should decide. But why on earth would we make them a democracy if we (the United States of America) cannot be a democracy?
How exactly are we not a democracy? A democracy is a government ruled by the people either directly or through elected representatives, or in broader terms, a rule by the majority opinion. The US fits that description. But even if we don't fit that perfectly, we are still a hell of a lot more of a democracy than Iraq was. And, just call me crazy here, but if the Iraqi people are allowed to choose their form of government, isn't that democratic rule? And, again, call me crazy, but if given the choice, how many of them do you think will choose dictatorship over democracy? To put it another way, would you feel comfortable going to Iraq and telling the people in some village there, "Sorry, the US is evil so it wouldn't be right to support a democratic government in your country. We're just going to leave you at the mercy of whichever faction is the strongest. We don't want to interfere with your rights."
For those of you that don't think the US can set up a democracy, look at Japan. I'll admit we don't have the best track record, but Japan didn't turn out too bad, and we essentially wrote their constitution for them and created their new government after WWII. Iraq has a good base for a thriving economy from their oil, and if control of the country can be given to the people, they could do pretty well.
I believe it was always common thought that the US is a republic.
Semantics IMHO, but you're splitting hairs in any case. Fine, we'll help the Iraqis set up a republic, that doesn't change my point that I'm sure they would want something along those lines a hell of a lot more than they would want another dictator.
You're right. Its semantics. Something law basically revolves around. But I did learn something. I looked up democracy (dictionary.com rocks ), and saw the definition you had written. So democracy works in this case, unless you are a lawyer. Sorry about the confusion.
Heh, no problem, I'm not a lawyer, I'm an engineer. And one thing you learn as an engineer is "close enough"