- May 6, 2013
- 1,814
- 143
- 106
The 2003 Iraq war that is. And the current Afghan war too. All the hero books praising U.S. troops fighting in the two wars involve fighting an enemy with limited weapons. The Iraq enemy had mostly machine guns, RPGs and IEDs. I think IEDs (roadside bombs) fall into the small arms category. Anyone want to refute this go ahead and post more advanced weapons used by them. I doubt if any are enough to make any difference in my point.
So this is nothing new to say the American military got into a stalemate against some Arabs with small arms. Seems a little awkward for the hero books to dance around that image. A typical counter argument to this is that the U.S. didn't send in enough troops to wipe out the enemy army/terrorists for good.
Or in a similar counter argument also used by conservatives: after the Surge in Iraq the U.S. reduced the number of troops to where it is now which is not enough to stop ISIS or other rebels in Iraq. Which means according to the righties it must be fault of the current White House Administration. Which is probably what most of those books say or at least imply.
So this is nothing new to say the American military got into a stalemate against some Arabs with small arms. Seems a little awkward for the hero books to dance around that image. A typical counter argument to this is that the U.S. didn't send in enough troops to wipe out the enemy army/terrorists for good.
Or in a similar counter argument also used by conservatives: after the Surge in Iraq the U.S. reduced the number of troops to where it is now which is not enough to stop ISIS or other rebels in Iraq. Which means according to the righties it must be fault of the current White House Administration. Which is probably what most of those books say or at least imply.