• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Iran's Influence in Iraq Raises Concerns

Drift3r

Guest
http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne.../iraq_iran_s_influence

Iran's Influence in Iraq Raises Concerns

2 hours, 56 minutes ago
By PAUL GARWOOD, Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A resounding Shiite victory in next month's elections will bring Iraq closer to Tehran, forming a "Super Iran" that could change the face of the Middle East, critics say.

But others discount such claims as exaggerations and say Iraq, a diverse country of Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds and Christians, will never let any outside player, particularly Iran's hard-line religious theocracy, dictate its future.

Views vary dramatically over what shape Iraq's political future will take following nationwide elections scheduled for Jan. 30, but few dispute that this Shiite-majority country's relations with its eastern neighbor ? which is ruled by Shiite ayatollahs ? will grow closer.

"Welcome to the new Iraq, this is the reality of Iraq where the majority are Shiite," said National Security adviser Mouwaffaq al-Rubaie, a candidate on the 228-member United Iraqi Alliance coalition embraced by Iraq's top Shiite cleric and featuring a wide range of Iraqi ethnic and religious groups, including some pro-Iranian Shiites.

While much attention centers on U.S. interference in Iraq through invading the country and occupying it with thousands of troops, a different struggle is going on between ordinary Iraqis ? one that looks set to re-map the national and regional political landscapes.

With Shiites accounting for 60 percent of Iraq's 26 million people, the Islamic sect that was long suppressed under Saddam Hussein and crushed in a 1991 uprising is expected to dominate next month's polls.

This may embolden Shiites here and throughout the Middle East, some regional analysts say. But Iraq's likely political shift is also stirring fears of the spread of an Iranian-brand of Shiite power throughout the Sunni Muslim-dominated region.

Jordan's King Abdullah, a pro-U.S. Sunni Muslim, this month said Iraq's elections could lead to the establishment of a hard-line Shiite regime based on the model in Iran, a country the United States accuses of sponsoring terrorism and trying to build nuclear weapons.

Iraq's interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, a secular Shiite running a separate ticket to the al-Sistani-backed one, accuses Iran of opposing Iraq's postwar reconstruction. His defense minister labels Iran as his country's "number one enemy" and calls the United Iraqi Alliance the "Iranian list" that would install a rule of "turbaned clerics" in Iran if it succeeds in the polls.

Al-Rubaie discounts such fears, saying any new government will demand security cooperation from Iran while at the same time seeking close relations with its neighbor.

"If we have any serious evidence that the Iranians are smuggling arms or interfering in our security and not helping in controlling security, Iraq will have very serious issues with Iran," he said, adding that he would quit the alliance if it seeks to adopt an Iranian-like government.

Views among Iraqi Shiites toward Iran range from hate to devotion. Despite 60 percent of Iraq's 26 million people being Shiite, many harbor resentment toward Iran over the bloody 1980-88 war between the countries in which 1 million people died. Many Iraqis also accuse Iran of sponsoring this country's rampant insurgency.

But many Iraqi Shiites, who were suppressed under Saddam's three-decade rule, also look to Iran's Shiite establishment for religious guidance.

This dichotomy is fueling election campaigns of various parties, which began Wednesday, including the United Iraqi Alliance, a coalition of independents and political parties dominated by Shiites ? both pro-Iranian and nationalists ? along with Sunnis, Kurds and other minorities.

Key among its parties is the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution, a group closely allied to Iran and led by Abdel Aziz al-Hakim, the alliance's top candidate whose comments about Iraq being responsible for compensating Iran for their war in the 1980s angered many Iraqis. Al-Hakim had lived in exile in Iran, where he led SCIRI's armed wing, the Iran-based Badr Brigade, during Saddam's rule.

Al-Hakim's prominence on the list and his close relations with Iran give ammunition to many secular and non-Shiites to attack his coalition, saying Iraq's political future will mirror Iran's Shiite-run establishment if he and his supporters gain power in Iraq's 275-member National Assembly.

Such a scenario worries people like Iraqi-born Mustafa Alani, director of national security at the Dubai-based regional think-tank the Gulf Research Center.

"The nightmare scenario in the region is the election of an Iranian-influenced Shiite government in Iraq will lead to the creation of a 'Super Iran' emerging as a regional superpower" says Alani. "We are talking about a huge shift in the region's power balance."

Such a development will force Arab Gulf states, like Sunni Muslim-ruled Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Bahrain, to "move closer together and with the United States to guarantee their own protection," he says.

But Entifadh Qanbar, spokesman for one of the United Iraqi Alliance parties, the Iraqi National Congress Party, says that although pro-Iranian lawmakers may win some National Assembly seats, most will go to politicians working for a secular government free from outside influence.

"I don't see a danger of a religious Shiite government coming to power in Iraq," Qanbar said. "There will be serious concerns if we do follow Iran's model."
 
Although I can see how people fear Iraq becoming Iran because of the Shiite majority, I don't see this "Super Iran" happening. The Iraqi Shiites were so long oppressed by the Sunnis and to finally have a chance to gain control, I don't think they would want to become another puppet to Iran. I think they will take a few things from Iran's regime, but I think eventually they will go their own way.

I also don't think sponsoring terrorism in the world is one of the things they would copy from Iran. Just my two cents.
 
The Shiites will win the election, that is obvious, so obvious that it has no need for a second thought, under shiite rule the sunnis and kurds will be allowed, for a while, just like in Israel, for a while, the bombings and the fighting will, of course continue for more than a decade, then there will be a civil war, when the US gets tired of keeping peace and getting soldiers killed for nothing.

And a new Israel Palestine situation is created, wooohooo, GO USA!

Replacing a minority rule with a majority rule isn't democracy in action when the majority will opress and fight the minority.... oh, wait, it is, isn't it, some states in the US voted FOR discrimination, did they not.

I guess majority rules is what will rule Iraq and what is ruling the US.

The sad thing is, we used to look up to the US as the shining beacon of democracy and freedom, now you can look up to us for the same reasons, what we have and you don't.
 
What I wonder is how the Iraqis on the streets themselves feel between this whole "Sunni and Shi'ite" thing.
Always there will be extremists Sunnis or Shi'ite, but for the most part people don't care becaues in the end they all see themselves as Muslims. This was true when my parents lived there. Furthermore when they went back to visit they asked about the whole issue and people essentially told them "The hell are you thinking- we are all Muslims". True, they were limited to Baghdad since that is where they lived, and only were able to talk to people at certain tmes of the day since you can't always be running around, so it isn't "scientific" or free from biases by any means~ but its encouraging nonetheless.
Furthermore, you'd think of this "opression" occurs to the degree that the media describes it as, the "sunnies" would have isolated themselves to the "shi'ites" --> yet marraige between the two "schools of thought" is common! My mom's "shi'ite" sister is married to a "sunni" man (and mind I add my mom's sister is a doctor? Oh yes...the opression of women is strong my friends!)

Honestly, I think that there will always be religious extremeists who want to create such distinctions within the Iraqi population themselves...but this is just a tactic to "divide and conquer" Iraqis to something that is easily overblown. The more factions taht we can create in the country, the easier it will be to play one side on the other and prevent any one from coming to power. As for Iraq siding with IRan~~ the two sides see eachother as brothers in that sense, but it doesn't supercede the sense of Nationalism/Patriotism that exists. No doubt there will be relations between the two countries, but I don't think it'll become this scenario where Iraq turns into a puppet state of Iran. Just won't go with the majority of Iraqis, despite religious affiliation.
 
Back
Top