• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Iran: Would you support...

A

Aimster

Lifer
Agreement:

Iran does not enrich uranium on their soil. Allows inspections to continue/resume.

U.S lifts all sanctions. Allows Iran to purchase additional Boeing aircraft and parts for their U.S military equipment.

Europe/U.S offer to build power plants inside Iran to help with Iran's energy needs.

U.S military leaves the Persian Gulf (Do we really need to be there?)



 
that last part will never happen. The USA wants to control the region, and bases througout a few gulf countries, as well as the debacle that is Iraq will prove that.
Why doesn't the "Western Powers" just learn that they don't want us fvcking in their business, yet it has been going on for well over a hundred years. Before that, the region was left to rot by the Ottomons. Last time the region shined is when they controlled their own land.
Iran is doing just that, and hopefully will continue to do so and cause other countries to pick up where others in the region left off in the late sixties to early 70s.
 
Sure, but it'll never happen.

1. Iran wants to be in control of their destiny as a nuclear power. They don't want to be dependent on anyone for their fuel.

2. The United States has too much invested in the "IRAN=TEH TERRARRR!!!@!@!" to give up sanctions and fearmongering. Also, United States just wants Iran as a puppet state, so no military hardware for them.

3. See #2. We don't help nations that have been deemed TEH TERRARRRARR!$$~!~!#~!@@!!!!

4. Never going to happen. Too many people are making too much money off of our military presence for us ever to leave. Plus, Israel likes us having forces nearby to defend them, so their troops wouldn't have to die.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top