Iran is continuing nuclear activities

[Freshgeardude]

two articles.

Fox News

J Post

Edit: add one more J post article
Here

from the fox news article

Ahmadinejad also demanded the U.S. apologize for 'crimes' committed against Iran; specifically, criticizing and trying to block their nuclear program. "Those who say they want to make change, this is the change they should make: they should apologize to the Iranian nation and try to make up for their dark background and the crimes they have committed against the Iranian nation," Ahmadinejad said.

from the jpost article

Earlier Wednesday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for "profound changes" in US foreign policy - including an end to support for Israel and an apology to the Islamic republic for past misdeeds.

Ahmadinejad also urged Washington to withdraw its troops stationed around the world. He said Iran would be closely watching what President Barack Obama's new administration does and would welcome a real shift in its approach.

yea, like the US is ever going to do that, especially the second paragraph


Ahmadinejad is so close minded it ceases to amaze me, he thinks he owns the world and can do what he wants. I hope Israel goes in and destroys Irans nuclear plants before they get enough enriched uranium

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

 

[sandorski]

The US should apologize for the Shah at least. I couldn't care less what warnings Israel has sent Iran, it's not Israels place to be dictating that to others.

 

[Freshgeardude]

Originally posted by: sandorski
The US should apologize for the Shah at least. I couldn't care less what warnings Israel has sent Iran, it's not Israels place to be dictating that to others.

sorry, added that US also told them to stop

 

[Freshgeardude]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

 

[Lemon law]

Israel is totally nuts if they think they can take on Iran, Iran is to big, too far way, and their nuclear facilities are buried too deep. The larger world will simply not tolerate Israeli aggression against Iran.

Even the ever delusional GWB and Cheney realized that was a non starter.

And the same UN that created Israel would have no choice but to dismantle Israel if they ever tried the stunt.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

Iran isn't a threat in any other way than that they supply weapons to Hamas and Hisb'Allah, that is what we need to deal with right now, the rest of this scare is just bullsheit.

Iran is a much less threat than Syria to Israel, why do you think Syria got their facilites bombed while Iran didn't? Because Syria HAD THEM and IRAN DOESN'T.

This is just left over GW fear bullsheit, Iran isn't a nuclear threat any more than Norway is a Nuclear threat.

 

[JS80]

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

 

[Freshgeardude]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

Iran isn't a threat in any other way than that they supply weapons to Hamas and Hisb'Allah, that is what we need to deal with right now, the rest of this scare is just bullsheit.

Iran is a much less threat than Syria to Israel, why do you think Syria got their facilites bombed while Iran didn't? Because Syria HAD THEM and IRAN DOESN'T.

This is just left over GW fear bullsheit, Iran isn't a nuclear threat any more than Norway is a Nuclear threat.

But can you trust a country with nuclear possibilities that calls for the destruction of israel and supplies funding to 2 terrorist organizations.

You can't compare that to norway because they supply terrorist groups nor call for tbe destruction of any country

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

No, 1 nuke over Israel and the responsible country will find itself at war.

Unless Israel nukes it first.

I know you have a hard on for killing Muslims, but even a nuke over Israel won't make any nation do that.

Sorry, but you can probably do a computer simulation and jerk off to that.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

Iran isn't a threat in any other way than that they supply weapons to Hamas and Hisb'Allah, that is what we need to deal with right now, the rest of this scare is just bullsheit.

Iran is a much less threat than Syria to Israel, why do you think Syria got their facilites bombed while Iran didn't? Because Syria HAD THEM and IRAN DOESN'T.

This is just left over GW fear bullsheit, Iran isn't a nuclear threat any more than Norway is a Nuclear threat.

But can you trust a country with nuclear possibilities that calls for the destruction of israel and supplies funding to 2 terrorist organizations.

You can't compare that to norway because they supply terrorist groups nor call for tbe destruction of any country

Nope, i wouldn't trust a country with nuclear options that was lead by a leader who was calling for the destruction of Israel.... I have YET to hear the LEADERS of Iran say anything like that, the President has, but he has about as much authority as a spokesman for the US does, he's not the leader nor does he have any military power or any authority.

They are comparable to Norway in the way that neither present a nuclear threat, but as i said, yes, they and Syria are the weapons suppliers to Hamas and Hisb'Allah.

That alone could be reson for action by economic sanctions, but that won't happen and i'm sure i don't have to tell you why.

 

[JS80]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

No, 1 nuke over Israel and the responsible country will find itself at war.

Unless Israel nukes it first.

I know you have a hard on for killing Muslims, but even a nuke over Israel won't make any nation do that.

Sorry, but you can probably do a computer simulation and jerk off to that.

OH CHEERIO LOOK AT ME I'M BRITISH I HAVE AN ACCENT I'M SO ENLIGHTENED THERE IS NO GOD YOU ARE ALL MORONS I KNOW EVERYTHING.

I have no idea what you're fucking talking about but my point was that Israel will turn every arab nation to glass in retaliation if they ever get nuked.

 

[Freshgeardude]

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

Not all of them but a lot of the surrounding countries will get affected. But, knowing iran, hamas and hezbollah, they will say every muslim who died, died for "the cause" or like that hamas leader said, human shields.

Listen, as much propaganda you may hear from thesnowman, lemon law, or any person who supports hamas, hezbolah, or any radical islamic group that supports hate and death, I can surely guarantee that these islamic people don't care about their own people. They forcibly use them as human shields and then tells the world israel purposely kills women and children. They even killed their own people in gaza for singing at a wedding. What moral person does that?! I'm on my phone, but you can try google for the video. I can guarantee it is there.

 

[JS80]

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

Not all of them but a lot of the surrounding countries will get affected. But, knowing iran, hamas and hezbollah, they will say every muslim who died, died for "the cause" or like that hamas leader said, human shields.

Listen, as much propaganda you may hear from thesnowman, lemon law, or any person who supports hamas, hezbolah, or any radical islamic group that supports hate and death, I can surely guarantee that these islamic people don't care about their own people. They forcibly use them as human shields and then tells the world israel purposely kills women and children. They even killed their own people in gaza for singing at a wedding. What moral person does that?! I'm on my phone, but you can try google for the video. I can guarantee it is there.

Yes you are stating the obvious. That is why Israel will probably, if it came down to it, do a suicide mission to stop Iran from ever getting the weapon. And if God forbid they are ever nuked, their end of world nuke retailiation program is probably to take every arab country down with them.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

No, 1 nuke over Israel and the responsible country will find itself at war.

Unless Israel nukes it first.

I know you have a hard on for killing Muslims, but even a nuke over Israel won't make any nation do that.

Sorry, but you can probably do a computer simulation and jerk off to that.

OH CHEERIO LOOK AT ME I'M BRITISH I HAVE AN ACCENT I'M SO ENLIGHTENED THERE IS NO GOD YOU ARE ALL MORONS I KNOW EVERYTHING.

I have no idea what you're fucking talking about but my point was that Israel will turn every arab nation to glass in retaliation if they ever get nuked.

Well, you did make me laugh.

 

[tvarad]

Originally posted by: freshgeardude
two articles.

Fox News

J Post

Edit: add one more J post article
Here

from the fox news article

Ahmadinejad also demanded the U.S. apologize for 'crimes' committed against Iran; specifically, criticizing and trying to block their nuclear program. "Those who say they want to make change, this is the change they should make: they should apologize to the Iranian nation and try to make up for their dark background and the crimes they have committed against the Iranian nation," Ahmadinejad said.

from the jpost article

Earlier Wednesday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for "profound changes" in US foreign policy - including an end to support for Israel and an apology to the Islamic republic for past misdeeds.

Ahmadinejad also urged Washington to withdraw its troops stationed around the world. He said Iran would be closely watching what President Barack Obama's new administration does and would welcome a real shift in its approach.

yea, like the US is ever going to do that, especially the second paragraph


Ahmadinejad is so close minded it ceases to amaze me, he thinks he owns the world and can do what he wants. I hope Israel goes in and destroys Irans nuclear plants before they get enough enriched uranium

I personally would love to see Iran nuked so that I don't have to see the pr*ck's face on TV once more nor hear any more of his rants. And while we're at it, let's lob one over Venezuala to shut Chavez's mouth.

 

[Lemon law]

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lets see if I can get my arm around the this concept of "wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.[/quote]"

Regardless if any of these Muslim nations had anything to do it or not?

Yet we are prepared to let Israel bomb Iran, Syria, or Iraq, on a premeditate basis.

As it is, if Israel bombs Iran, Iran would have every right to strike back with the missiles they have.

So that would give Israel the right to hit Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordon, Iraq, and all the Muslim nations of earth.

You sir, are a war mongering nut and nothing but.

Why should we trust a nuclear armed Israel with delusional leadership?

 

[Freshgeardude]

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is jdestroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

Not all of them but a lot of the surrounding countries will get affected. But, knowing iran, hamas and hezbollah, they will say every muslim who died, died for "the cause" or like that hamas leader said, human shields.

Listen, as much propaganda you may hear from thesnowman, lemon law, or any person who supports hamas, hezbolah, or any radical islamic group that supports hate and death, I can surely guarantee that these islamic people don't care about their own people. They forcibly use them as human shields and then tells the world israel purposely kills women and children. They even killed their own people in gaza for singing at a wedding. What moral person does that?! I'm on my phone, but you can try google for the video. I can guarantee it is there.

Yes you are stating the obvious. That is why Israel will probably, if it came down to it, do a suicide mission to stop Iran from ever getting the weapon. And if God forbid they are ever nuked, their end of world nuke retailiation program is probably to take every arab country down with them.

Yea cause Israel always looks to retaliate for every attack on it...

Get out of here troll or at least give valid and reasonable discussion

Secondly... israelis are not kamakazi fighters nor Suicide bombers like radical Islamic members have done. Israel has been very elite in every mission that was top secret before in the past. I don't see them changing any time soon

 

[JS80]

Originally posted by: Lemon law

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lets see if I can get my arm around the this concept of "wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

Regardless if any of these Muslim nations had anything to do it or not?

Yet we are prepared to let Israel bomb Iran, Syria, or Iraq, on a premeditate basis.

As it is, if Israel bombs Iran, Iran would have every right to strike back with the missiles they have.

So that would give Israel the right to hit Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordon, Iraq, and all the Muslim nations of earth.

You sir, are a war mongering nut and nothing but.

Why should we trust a nuclear armed Israel with delusional leadership?

You first need to understand good vs evil, right vs wrong to understand the argument. But people like you only know gray and no black and white.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

No, 1 nuke over Israel and the responsible country will find itself at war.

Unless Israel nukes it first.

I know you have a hard on for killing Muslims, but even a nuke over Israel won't make any nation do that.

Sorry, but you can probably do a computer simulation and jerk off to that.

OH CHEERIO LOOK AT ME I'M BRITISH I HAVE AN ACCENT I'M SO ENLIGHTENED THERE IS NO GOD YOU ARE ALL MORONS I KNOW EVERYTHING.

I have no idea what you're fucking talking about but my point was that Israel will turn every arab nation to glass in retaliation if they ever get nuked.

Seriously though, the surrounding countries (the Arab nations, Indonesia, most of Africa, Iran and all of the other Muslim nations) are about 3x the size of the US, i don't really think you have thought this through...

But maybe it's just me being a knowitall and you know better?

In short, since you don't seem to be all that bright, the entire Muslim world is BIG and Israel hasn't got the nuclear capability to wipe out even one tenth of it.

Those are the facts...

Cheerio.

 

[Freshgeardude]

Originally posted by: Lemon law

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lets see if I can get my arm around the this concept of "wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

Regardless if any of these Muslim nations had anything to do it or not?

Yet we are prepared to let Israel bomb Iran, Syria, or Iraq, on a premeditate basis.

As it is, if Israel bombs Iran, Iran would have every right to strike back with the missiles they have.

So that would give Israel the right to hit Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordon, Iraq, and all the Muslim nations of earth.

You sir, are a war mongering nut and nothing but.

Why should we trust a nuclear armed Israel with delusional leadership?

Now I agree an israeli attack right now would allow iran to may have a retaliation, I think your last sentence is delusional.

Israel does not, has not, and will never call for the destruction of ANY country. They, like every country with nuclear power are responsible with them and don't obviously call for countries to be wiped off a map.

 

[Lemon law]

The fundamental flaw in this whole thread lies in its title of "Despite Israel AND US calling for them to stop"

There in lies the rub, the USA and Israel are the lone rangers here, nor is it clear that Obama agrees, somewhat making Israel the lone lone rangers. As Israel, a nation with only seven million people, trying to dictate to a planet with billions of people. How self delusional can Israel get?

 

[Freshgeardude]

Ah gay html. Its not editing an error in my last post. Somehow the quote box didn't close around lemons post


---------------------------------------
And only a 15 second job to repair.

Senior Anandtech Moderator
Common Courtesy

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: Lemon law

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I really couldn't care less.

First threat makes them a hole in the ground so for their own sake i hope they know better.

problem with this idea is that, 1 nuke over israel, and it is destroyed. one bomb. thats one slip or error in the Israel passive defense.

they have been past the first threat. they have had enriched uranium since 2003.

wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lets see if I can get my arm around the this concept of "wrong. 1 nuke over israel = all muslim nations turn to glass.

"

Regardless if any of these Muslim nations had anything to do it or not?

Yet we are prepared to let Israel bomb Iran, Syria, or Iraq, on a premeditate basis.

As it is, if Israel bombs Iran, Iran would have every right to strike back with the missiles they have.

So that would give Israel the right to hit Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordon, Iraq, and all the Muslim nations of earth.

You sir, are a war mongering nut and nothing but.

Why should we trust a nuclear armed Israel with delusional leadership?

Now I agree an israeli attack right now would allow iran to may have a retaliation, I think your last sentence is delusional.

Israel does not, has not, and will never call for the destruction of ANY country. They, like every country with nuclear power are responsible with them and don't obviously call for countries to be wiped off a map.

I'm going to have to go ahead and agree with this statement. In fact, for Palestinians, NO other nation in the area has been a bigger saviour to them.

They have provided water when others shut them out, they provided food and fuel when others denied them, the only reason they are still alive at all is because of Israel, the biggest friend they ever head in the region, they were allowed to work in Israel and travel through the borders freely before Hamas, they were never allowed to pass through to any other neighbouring country.

Biggest issue of all is that they are mostly Jordanians, palestinians live in Israel and in fugitive camps in Lebanon, Jordan and Syria.

 

[Socio]

Originally posted by: freshgeardude
two articles.


Ahmadinejad is so close minded it ceases to amaze me, he thinks he owns the world and can do what he wants. I hope Israel goes in and destroys Irans nuclear plants before they get enough enriched uranium

Well he can, the US cannot afford to do anything about it now, our new president talks softly carries a Styrofoam stick and Iran knows it. Israel would like to but without US support they probably won?t try and no one else in the world today has the balls too.

Thus Iran has the run of the yard now and can do whatever they want even nuke Israel likely facing nothing but finger waving and condemnation. I believe that if McCain had gotten elected they would have been afraid of nuclear retaliation from the US, however since it was Obama that got elected that fear level dropped significantly.

I expect Iran to become more and more aggressive over the next year to see how far they can push the Obama Administration, when they become comfortable enough that they have little to fear from them, BOOM no more Israel.