Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Goddamnit, it is impossible to have a conversation with you. I know you didn't say it costs $500, I never said you did. Simple reading comprehension would show you that. I assume when you speak of players that are equal in terms of features or sound quality bust cost half as much, you are talking of the Karma? If not, then what players are you talking about? I see the Karma's lowest price shipped from a reputable vendor being $188, obviously not half as much. Please show me these 20GB mp3 players which are equal in terms of features and/or sound quality that I can get for less than $145 shipped from a reputable vendor.
Again, stop assuming I trust him, and that I am not thinking for myself. I am merely pointing out, that a well respected reviewer of DAPs (think what you want about him getting money from Apple), and try reading his reviews to see what he knows, or is that too much research/work for you? Did I say "OMG, the iPod is kickass because someone said so."? Not quite.
I never claimed you said that I had stated the Ipod was $500, you mentioend something about simple reading comprehension?

Actually we are conversing on it, and though it's not as smooth as it could be, it beats having young'uns lie about what I've said and call me names for disagreeing with them, all while mysteriously avoiding actual issues, so I guess I can't complain.
The player which is as little as half as much is the 40gb Zen Xtra, as low as $200 vs. $400 for the 40gb ipod.
Your post did indeed read as "soandso says it, so it must be true". Perhaps it's because you gave no actual reasoning for your feeling that it's a good player. I never said that he's taking money under the table from Apple, I only brought it up as a possibility. My point was simply that we have no idea where he's coming from without knowing him personally or chatting with him about it. What if you had his AIM name and asked him about it, only to get a response like "wut ur 2 b iz ne1 plz"? Would you still take him seriously? We have no way of knowing his angle on this. It could be as simple as his editor not wanting to piss off Apple for fear of losing advertising dollars from them.